Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 408

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Synergisms in Plant Defenses against Herbivores: Interactions of Chemistry, Calcification, and Plant Quality

Open access
Hay, Mark E., Kappel, Quaker E., Fenical, William·1994·Ecology

Abstract

Many tropical seaweeds and benthic invertebrates produce both secondary metabolites and calcium carbonate (CaCO 3) particles or spicules that serve as possible defenses against consumers. To evaluate the relative defensive value of CaCO 3, secondary metabolites, and the potential synergistic or additive effects of the two, we made artificial agar—based “seaweeds” in which we manipulated algal organic content, CaCO 3, and the secondary metabolites produced by the calcified green seaweeds Rhipocephalus phoenix, Udotea cyathiformis, and Halimeda goreauii, all of which are relatively resistant to herbivores. The effects of these manipulations on herbivore feeding were evaluated using three different types of herbivores, the sea urchin Diadema antillarum, the amphipod Cymadusa filosa, and a mixed—species group of small parrotfishes. Addition of finely powdered CaCO 3 as 69% of food dry mass had no effect on feeding by parrotfishes, deterred feeding by Cymadusa, and deterred Diadema when food organic content was low but not when it was higher. Although calcification of algal tissues has generally been considered a structural defense that hardens seaweed thalli and makes them more resistant to attack, the decreased feeding on CaCO 3—containing foods in our assays occurred without any measurable alternation of food toughness. At natural concentrations, semipurified secondary metabolites from Rhipocephalus or Udotea deterred feeding by all three herbivores. In most assays, feeding was depressed more by the addition of metabolites from Rhipocephalus or Udotea than by the addition of CaCO 3 even though CaCO 3 was added at 1.3—2.2 times the natural concentration for these plants. In contrast, the major metabolite from Halimeda goreauii, when tested alone, did not affect feeding by any of the herbivores. In two of our nine assays, the synchronous combination of CaCO 3 and secondary metabolites acted synergistically and deterred feeding significantly more than the sum of the effects of each tested separately. Mechanisms producing these synergisms are unknown, but it is possible that calcification could also be acting as a chemical defense by altering gut pH in ways that increase the potency of the secondary metabolites. It is common for chemical, structural, morphological, and nutritional deterrents to co—occur in individual prey species. For some plant—herbivore interactions, the combined effects of these characteristics can be much more than the sum of their separate effects.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/1939631

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 408

Metadata

Authors
Hay, M. E., Kappel, Q. E., & Fenical, W.
Venue
Ecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1994-09
Volume
75
Issue
6
Pages
1714-1726
ISSN
  • 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-9170
OpenAlex
W2127772214
Cited by
408
References
0
FWCI
12.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Synergisms in Plant Defenses against Herbivores: Interactions of Chemistry, Calcification, and Plant Quality. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1939631
The paper
Hay, M. E., Kappel, Q. E., & Fenical, W. (1994). Synergisms in Plant Defenses against Herbivores: Interactions of Chemistry, Calcification, and Plant Quality. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/1939631

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.