Environmental Impact Assessment: "Pseudoreplication" in Time?
Abstract
A recent monograph by Hurlbert raised several problems concerning the appropriate design of sampling programs to assess the impact upon the abundance of biological populations of, for example, the discharge of effluents into an aquatic ecosystem at a single point. Key to the resolution of these issues is the correct identification of the statistical parameter of interest, which is the mean of the underlying probabilistic "process" that produces the abundance, rather than the actual abundance itself. We describe an appropriate sampling scheme designed to detect the effect of the discharge upon this underlying mean. Although not guaranteed to be universally applicable, the design should meet Hurlbert's objections in many cases. Detection of the effect of the discharge is achieved by testing whether the difference between abundances at a control site and an impact site changes once the discharge begins. This requires taking samples, replicated in time, Before the discharge begins and After it has begun, at both the Control and Impact sites (hence this is called a BACI design). Care needs to be taken in choosing a control site so that it is sufficiently far from the discharge to be largely beyond its influence, yet close enough that it is influenced by the same range of natural phenomena (e.g., weather) that result in long—term changes in the biological populations. The design is not appropriate where local events cause populations at Control and Impact sites to have different lo…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The methods incorporated a before-after-reference-restoration (BARR) sampling design, conceptually the same as before-after-reference-impact (BARI).
“The methods incorporated a before-afterreference-restoration (BARR) sampling design, which is conceptually the same as before-afterreference-impact (BARI; Stewart-Oaten and Murdoch 1986).”
From Evidence‐based evaluation of the cumulative effects of ecosystem restoration (2016) · cites this paper as Stewart-Oaten and Murdoch 1986
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 48 · Cited by 1,331
- Authors
- Stewart-Oaten, A., Murdoch, W. W., & Parker, K. R.
- ORCID
- Murdoch, William W.
- Venue
- Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1986-08
- Volume
- 67
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 929-940
- ISSN
- 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2020874071
- Cited by
- 1,331
- References
- 48
- Citations by year
- 2026: 38 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 55 · 2021: 56 · 2020: 44 · 2019: 55 · 2018: 44 · 2017: 49 · 2016: 45 · 2015: 32 · 2014: 41 · 2013: 41 · 2012: 47
- FWCI
- 82.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Ecology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Environmental and Social Impact Assessments
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
- Keywords
- pseudoreplication, BACI design, before-after-control-impact design, effluent discharge, population abundance, sampling design, additivity assumption, independence assumption, environmental impact assessment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review