Cited by 1,331Environmental and Social Impact AssessmentsEcology and Vegetation Dynamics StudiesEnvironmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology

Environmental Impact Assessment: "Pseudoreplication" in Time?

Stewart-Oaten, Allan, Murdoch, William W., Parker, Keith R.·1986·Ecology

Abstract

A recent monograph by Hurlbert raised several problems concerning the appropriate design of sampling programs to assess the impact upon the abundance of biological populations of, for example, the discharge of effluents into an aquatic ecosystem at a single point. Key to the resolution of these issues is the correct identification of the statistical parameter of interest, which is the mean of the underlying probabilistic "process" that produces the abundance, rather than the actual abundance itself. We describe an appropriate sampling scheme designed to detect the effect of the discharge upon this underlying mean. Although not guaranteed to be universally applicable, the design should meet Hurlbert's objections in many cases. Detection of the effect of the discharge is achieved by testing whether the difference between abundances at a control site and an impact site changes once the discharge begins. This requires taking samples, replicated in time, Before the discharge begins and After it has begun, at both the Control and Impact sites (hence this is called a BACI design). Care needs to be taken in choosing a control site so that it is sufficiently far from the discharge to be largely beyond its influence, yet close enough that it is influenced by the same range of natural phenomena (e.g., weather) that result in long—term changes in the biological populations. The design is not appropriate where local events cause populations at Control and Impact sites to have different lo…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/1939815

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The methods incorporated a before-after-reference-restoration (BARR) sampling design, conceptually the same as before-after-reference-impact (BARI).

    “The methods incorporated a before-afterreference-restoration (BARR) sampling design, which is conceptually the same as before-afterreference-impact (BARI; Stewart-Oaten and Murdoch 1986).”

    From Evidence‐based evaluation of the cumulative effects of ecosystem restoration (2016) · cites this paper as Stewart-Oaten and Murdoch 1986

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 48 · Cited by 1,331

Authors
Stewart-Oaten, A., Murdoch, W. W., & Parker, K. R.
Venue
Ecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1986-08
Volume
67
Issue
4
Pages
929-940
ISSN
0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2020874071
Cited by
1,331
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 38 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 55 · 2021: 56 · 2020: 44 · 2019: 55 · 2018: 44 · 2017: 49 · 2016: 45 · 2015: 32 · 2014: 41 · 2013: 41 · 2012: 47
FWCI
82.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Ecology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Environmental and Social Impact Assessments
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
Keywords
pseudoreplication, BACI design, before-after-control-impact design, effluent discharge, population abundance, sampling design, additivity assumption, independence assumption, environmental impact assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review