The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Anova for Unbalanced Data: An Overview
Abstract
Ecological studies typically involve comparison of biological responses among a variety of environmental conditions. When the response variables have continuous distributions and the conditions are discrete, whether inherently or by design, then it is appropriate to analyze the data using analysis of variance (ANOVA). When data conform to a complete, balanced design (equal numbers of observations in each experimental treatment), it is straightforward to conduct an ANOVA, particularly with the aid of the numerous statistical computing packages that are available. Interpretation of an ANOVA of balanced data is also unambiguous. Unfortunately, for a variety of reasons, it is rare that a practicing ecologist embarks on an analysis of data that are completely balanced. Regardless of its cause, lack of balance necessitates care in the analysis and interpretation. In this paper, our aims is to provide an overview of the consequences of lack of balance and to give some guidelines to analyzing unbalanced data for models involving fixed effects. Our treatment is necessarily cursory and will not substitute for training available from a sequence of courses in mathematical statistics and linear models. It is intended to introduce the reader to the main issues and to the extensive statistical literature that deals with them.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
FITTING MULTIVARIATE MODELS TO COMMUNITY DATA: A COMMENT ON DISTANCE-BASED REDUNDANCY ANALYSIS
McArdle, B. H., & Anderson, M. J. (2001) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/0012-9658(2001)082[0290:fmmtcd]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 4,001
Why Psychologists Should by Default Use Welch’s t-test Instead of Student’s t-test
Delacre, M., Lakens, D., & Leys, C. (2017) · International Review of Social Psychology · doi:10.5334/irsp.82 · Cited by 1,037
ANOVA for unbalanced data: Use Type II instead of Type III sums of squares
Langsrud, Ø. (2003) · Statistics and Computing · doi:10.1023/a:1023260610025 · Cited by 469
Seed Banks in Desert Annuals: Implications for Persistence and Coexistence in Variable Environments
Pake, C. E., & Venable, D. L. (1996) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/2265540 · Cited by 375
Plant diversity positively affects short‐term soil carbon storage in experimental grasslands
STEINBEISS, S., BEßLER, H., ENGELS, C., TEMPERTON, V. M., BUCHMANN, N., ROSCHER, C., KREUTZIGER, Y., BAADE, J., HABEKOST, M., & GLEIXNER, G. (2008) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01697.x · Cited by 348
Metadata
- Authors
- Shaw, R. G., & Mitchell-Olds, T.
- Venue
- Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1993-09
- Volume
- 74
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1638-1645
- ISSN
- 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-9170
- OpenAlex
- W2050482698
- Cited by
- 542
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 17.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Anova for Unbalanced Data: An Overview. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1939922
- The paper
- Shaw, R. G., & Mitchell-Olds, T. (1993). Anova for Unbalanced Data: An Overview. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/1939922
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.