Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 363

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Juvenile Competitive Bottlenecks: The Perch (Perca Fluviatilis)‐Roach (Rutilus Rutilus) Interaction

Persson, Lennart, Greenberg, Larry A.·1990·Ecology

Abstract

In size—structured populations interspecific competitors often have been suggested to have their greatest impact on the juvenile life stage. We hypothesized that roach (Rutilus rutilus), by virtue of their superior foraging ability on zooplankton, would cause juvenile perch (Perca fluviatilis) to shift from feeding on zooplankton to macroinvertebrate prey, the prey consumed by adult perch. This should potentially increase size—class competition in perch, producing a competitive bottleneck at the macroinvertebrate feeding stage. To test this, we experimentally examined how roach density affected both the diet and growth of young—of—the—year (0+) and 1—yr—old (1+) perch as well as how it affected the zooplankton and benthic macroinvertebrate resource levels in 10 enclosures in a pond over a 3—mo period. The densities of 0+ and 1+ perch were held constant between enclosures, where the density of roach was varied over five density levels. A significant effect of roach density on zooplankton (cladoceran) biomass was observed over the experimental period. By the end of the experiment, the biomass of zooplankton was low in all enclosures except those without roach, and the mean size of two zooplankters, Bosmina and cyclopoid copepods, decreased with increasing roach density. In contrast, the total biomass of macroinvertebrates in the enclosures did not change with increasing roach density. There was, however, evidence that chironomids were released from predation by Sialis due to an increased consumption of Sialis by 1+ perch. As predicted from our hypothesis, 0+ perch shifted from pelagic zooplankton to benthic macroinvertebrates as roach density increased. The roach density at which 0+ perch shifted to feed on benthic prey decreased over the experimental period, but occurred at the same density of pelagic prey. The proportion of zooplankton in the diet of 1+ perch and roach also decreased with increasing roach density, with 1+ perch totally dropping zooplankton from their diet and roach shifting to plant to detrital material. Over time we observed that roach increased its utilization of plant and detrital material. We found density dependence in growth rates of roach and 0+ perch as well as 1+ perch. The growth data suggested that the main competitive effect of roach occurred during the first half of the experiment. This was related to roach's high consumption of plant material at all roach densities at the end of the experiment and to the low water temperature during the second half of the experiment.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/1940246

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 363

Metadata

Authors
Persson, L., & Greenberg, L. A.
Venue
Ecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1990-02
Volume
71
Issue
1
Pages
44-56
ISSN
  • 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-9170
OpenAlex
W2071282925
Cited by
363
References
0
FWCI
14.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Juvenile Competitive Bottlenecks: The Perch (Perca Fluviatilis)‐Roach (Rutilus Rutilus) Interaction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1940246
The paper
Persson, L., & Greenberg, L. A. (1990). Juvenile Competitive Bottlenecks: The Perch (Perca Fluviatilis)‐Roach (Rutilus Rutilus) Interaction. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/1940246

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.