The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Presettlement Regeneration Patterns in a Southwestern Ponderosa Pine Stand
Abstract
Tree stems @>106 yr old (i.e., established before significant European influence in this area) in a 7.3—ha old—growth ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa) forest in northern Arizona were aged and mapped. Age structure analysis showed that successful establishment of ponderosa pine was infrequent. The periods without successful establishment could be quite long, as suggested by four consecutive decades in which only two surviving trees were established. The stems were strongly aggregated, as measured with nearest neighbor analysis, and groups were visually distinct in the field. Most of the stems occurred in groups of three or more, with group size ranging from 3 to 44 stems and area occupied by a group ranging from 0.02 to 0.29 ha. Ages of stems within groups were variable, the most homogeneous group having a range of 33 yr and the least having a range of 268 yr. The data are not consistent with the commonly held view that southwestern ponderosa pine occurs in even—aged groups and that each group became established following the demise of the group previously occupying the site. Instead, it seems more likely that seedlings became established when one or two trees within the group died, the additional fuel surrounding the dead trees causing an intensely burned spot in the otherwise low—intensity fires that were frequent in the area. The hot spot would create a potential seedbed for pine by eliminating, at least temporarily, the competing grasses on that small area. This decreased competition, in conjunction with adequate seed production and favorable moisture conditions in the spring and early summer, may well have been critical for ponderosa pine establishment. The relative infrequency of all these events occurring in the necessary sequence could explain the erratic age structure data from this area.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
ECOLOGICAL RESTORATION OF SOUTHWESTERN PONDEROSA PINE ECOSYSTEMS: A BROAD PERSPECTIVE
Allen, C. D., Savage, M., Falk, D. A., Suckling, K. F., Swetnam, T. W., Schulke, T., Stacey, P. B., Morgan, P., Hoffman, M., & Klingel, J. T. (2002) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1890/1051-0761(2002)012[1418:erospp]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 945
Fire-Southern Oscillation Relations in the Southwestern United States
Swetnam, T. W., & Betancourt, J. L. (1990) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.249.4972.1017 · Cited by 672
DETERMINING REFERENCE CONDITIONS FOR ECOSYSTEM MANAGEMENT OF SOUTHWESTERN PONDEROSA PINE FORESTS
Fulé, P. Z., Covington, W. W., & Moore, M. M. (1997) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1890/1051-0761(1997)007[0895:drcfem]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 661
Restoring ecosystem health in Ponderosa pine forests of the southwest
Covington, W. W., Fulé, P. Z., Moore, M. M., Hart, S. C., Kolb, T. E., Mast, J. N., Sackett, S. S., & Wagner, M. R. (1997) · Journal of Forestry · doi:10.1093/jof/95.4.23 · Cited by 595
Hessburg, P. F., Salter, R. B., & James, K. M. (2007) · Landscape Ecology · doi:10.1007/s10980-007-9098-2 · Cited by 181
Metadata
- Authors
- White, A. S.
- Venue
- Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1985-04
- Volume
- 66
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 589-594
- ISSN
- 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-9170
- OpenAlex
- W2152267927
- Cited by
- 306
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Presettlement Regeneration Patterns in a Southwestern Ponderosa Pine Stand. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1940407
- The paper
- White, A. S. (1985). Presettlement Regeneration Patterns in a Southwestern Ponderosa Pine Stand. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/1940407
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.