Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 195

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Temporal Coupling of Production and Recruitment of Larvae of a Caribbean Reef Fish

Robertson, D. Ross, Green, David G., Victor, Benjamin C.·1988·Ecology

Abstract

Variation in larval recruitment is thought to have profound effects on the structure of coral reef fish communities, and planktonic processes often are cited as the major factor controlling the temporal and spatial patterns of such recruitment. We looked at the relationship between temporal patterns of larval production and settlement of planktonic larvae of the Caribbean damselfish Stegastes partitus at one site and attributed any differences to processes acting in the plankton. In doing so we assumed that the pattern of production we observed was representative of the regime that produced fish that settled in the study area. We monitored spawning and larval recruitment continuously for 3 yr. Both spawning and settlement followed (unimodal) lunar cycles, and both activities spanned °3 wk of the lunar month. Although the form of the average settlement cycle matched that of the average production cycle, monthly settlement episodes were shorter and (slightly) more variably timed than equivalent production episodes. Although monthly variability in the magnitude of settlement was fourfold greater than corresponding variability in the magnitude of larval production, monthly settlement success did not vary in an extreme manner. There was no significant correlation between the magnitude of larval production in a month and of settlement the following month. Daily growth increments in the otoliths of settlers indicated that (1) larvae were °5 wk old at settlement, (2) there was low overall variability in age at settlement, (3) there were no differences between the ages of settlers arriving early and late in the monthly settlement period, and (4) age variability among settlers collected on the same day was not different from that among settlers collected on different days. Hence, the basic lunar periodicity of settlement is determined by the periodicity of production of relatively fixed—age settlers. Planktonic processes enhance the temporal variability of settlement, principally by affecting the magnitude of settlement events, but also by influencing the duration and precise timing of monthly settlement episodes. Planktonic processes also determine that most of a month's successful settlers arrive (and are produced) over a few consecutive days and mix cohorts of larvae that are produced on different days. We conclude that the timing and magnitude of settlement are strongly influenced by both production and planktonic processes, and the latter only partly decouple settlement and production.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/1940435

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 195

Metadata

Authors
Robertson, D. R., Green, D. G., & Victor, B. C.
Venue
Ecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1988-04
Volume
69
Issue
2
Pages
370-381
ISSN
  • 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-9170
OpenAlex
W2323543100
Cited by
195
References
0
FWCI
9.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Temporal Coupling of Production and Recruitment of Larvae of a Caribbean Reef Fish. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1940435
The paper
Robertson, D. R., Green, D. G., & Victor, B. C. (1988). Temporal Coupling of Production and Recruitment of Larvae of a Caribbean Reef Fish. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/1940435

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.