The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Modifying Lodgepole Pine Stands to Change Susceptibility to Mountain Pine Beetle Attack
Abstract
The premise that mature lodgepole pine forests are susceptible to mountain pine beetle attack when physiologically stressed was supported experimentally by manipulating the canopy density and availability of nitrogen in a 120—yr—old forest exposed to a high population of beetles. Where canopy density was reduced, ether by us or by the insects, surviving trees significantly increased their resistance to attack over a 3—yr period. Increased resistance was reflected by changes in wood production per unit of leaf area (tree growth efficiency). Improved nitrogen nutrition hastened tree recovery but did not prevent attacks by beetles until growth efficiencies exceeded 100 g of wood production per square metre of foliage. Growth efficiency, as here defined, is an index of vigor that may reflect the relative ability of susceptible trees to produce defensive compounds following attack.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Phytophagous insects as regulators of forest primary production
Mattson, W. J., & Addy, N. D. (1975) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.190.4214.515 · Cited by 573
Cited by
Restoring ecosystem health in Ponderosa pine forests of the southwest
Covington, W. W., Fulé, P. Z., Moore, M. M., Hart, S. C., Kolb, T. E., Mast, J. N., Sackett, S. S., & Wagner, M. R. (1997) · Journal of Forestry · doi:10.1093/jof/95.4.23 · Cited by 595
Fettig, C. J., Klepzig, K. D., Billings, R. F., Munson, A. S., Nebeker, T. E., Negrón, J. F., & Nowak, J. T. (2007) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2006.10.011 · Cited by 529
Resistance of conifers to bark beetle attack: Searching for general relationships
Christiansen, E., Waring, R. H., & Berryman, A. A. (1987) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/0378-1127(87)90098-3 · Cited by 462
Self-citationEvaluating theories of drought‐induced vegetation mortality using a multimodel–experiment framework
McDowell, N. G., Fisher, R. A., Xu, C., Domec, J. C., Hölttä, T., Mackay, D. S., Sperry, J. S., Boutz, A., Dickman, L., Gehres, N., et al. (2013) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.12465 · Cited by 420
Self-citationThe Adaptive Significance of Tree Height
King, D. A. (1990) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/285075 · Cited by 309
Metadata
- Authors
- Waring, R. H., & Pitman, G. B.
- Venue
- Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1985-06
- Volume
- 66
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 889-897
- ISSN
- 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-9170
- OpenAlex
- W2108467630
- Cited by
- 416
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 13.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Modifying Lodgepole Pine Stands to Change Susceptibility to Mountain Pine Beetle Attack. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1940551
- The paper
- Waring, R. H., & Pitman, G. B. (1985). Modifying Lodgepole Pine Stands to Change Susceptibility to Mountain Pine Beetle Attack. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/1940551
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.