Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 258

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Phosphorus Spiralling in a Woodland Stream: Seasonal Variations

Open access
Mulholland, Patrick J., Newbold, J. Denis, Elwood, Jerry W., Ferren, Leigh Ann, Webster, Jackson R.·1985·Ecology

Abstract

Four radiotracer releases were performed over an annual period in 1981—1982 to determine seasonal variation in indices and pathways of phosphorus spiralling in Walker Branch, a small woodland stream in eastern Tennessee, USA. Each release consisted of an addition of °370 MBq each of carrier—free 32 PO 4 and 3 H 2 O over a 1—h period during baseflow. Concentrations of 32 P and 3 H dissolved in stream water were measured intensitively at several stations downstream for the radiotracer input during and immediately following each release. Activity of 32 P in coarse particulate organic matter (CPOM), fine particulate organic matter (FPOM), and aufwuchs was measured 2—3 h after each release and at various intervals for 7 wk. Total biomass of CPOM, FPOm, and aufwuchs at the time of each release was also measured. Uptake of 32 PO 4 from the water was greatest in November and lowest in August, Uptake length (S w) of phosphorus, defined as the average distance travelled by a PO 4 ion dissolved in water, varied from 22 m in November to 97 m in August. Uptake of 32 PO 4 by CPOM was generally greatest, with °50% of total uptake, while that by aufwuchs was lowest, with <15% of the total. CPOM abundance was the major determinant of whole—steam PO 4 uptake rate and S w. Turnover length (S p) of phosphorus, defined as the average distance traveled by an atom of P taken up by particulate material, was short compared to S w, varying from 1 m in November to 3 m in January. Consequently total spiralling length (S) of P varied from 23 in November, just after peak autumn leaf fall, to 99 m in August, and reflected primarily the travel of P in the dissolved form. Our results indicate that the greatest increase in S w, (and consequently in S) in Walker Branch occurs in late autumn or winter after storms reduce the abundance of CPOM in the lower portions of the stream bed. Although we calculate that S p may increase by one of two orders of magnitude for short periods during storms, the greatest effect of storms on P spiralling over the long term is their impact on the quality of CPOM and FPOM in the stream bed after the return to baseflow. For most of the year, detrital organic carbon probably influences phosphorus spiralling more than phosphorus spiralling influences the processing of organic carbon in Walker Branch. Only during the fall and early winter periods, when CPOM abundance is high and S w is short, does phosphorus spiralling exert strong control over biotic processes downstream.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/1940562

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 258

Metadata

Authors
Mulholland, P. J., Newbold, J. D., Elwood, J. W., Ferren, L. A., & Webster, J. R.
Venue
Ecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1985-06
Volume
66
Issue
3
Pages
1012-1023
ISSN
  • 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-9170
OpenAlex
W2144263830
Cited by
258
References
0
FWCI
5.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Phosphorus Spiralling in a Woodland Stream: Seasonal Variations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1940562
The paper
Mulholland, P. J., Newbold, J. D., Elwood, J. W., Ferren, L. A., & Webster, J. R. (1985). Phosphorus Spiralling in a Woodland Stream: Seasonal Variations. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/1940562

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.