The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Numerical and Functional Responses of Kestrels, Short‐Eared Owls, and Long‐Eared Owls to Vole Densities
Abstract
We studied numerical and functional responses of breeding European Kestrels (EK) (Falco tinnunculus), Short—eared Owls (SO) (Asio flammeus), and Long—eared Owls (LO) (Asio otus) during 1977—1987 in 47 km 2 of farmland in western Finland. The pooled mean yearly breeding density varied from 0.1 to 2.4 pairs/km 2. The number of nesting EKs (range 2—46 pairs), SOs (0—49), and LOs (0—19) fluctuated in close accordance with the spring density of Microtus (M. agrestis and M. epiroticus) voles. The mean yearly number of fledglings produced per pair ranged from 0.4 to 3.8 and, for each species, was positively correlated with spring density of Microtus voles. Due to their high degree of mobility, EKs, SOs, and LOs were able to track the population fluctuations of their microtine prey without time lags. An increase in microtine densities caused a rapid immigration into the study area and a decrease caused a rapid emigration from the area. Microtus voles were the most important prey group by mass in the diet of each species. Water voles, bank voles, shrews, and small birds were the most frequent alternate prey. The spring density of Microtus spp. was positively correlated with the percentage of these voles in the diet of EK, SO, and LO. The pooled functional response curve of these three raptor species to the fluctuating densities of Microtus spp. was close to linear, indicating that consumption rates are independent of vole densities. Breeding EKs, SOs, and LOs seemed to take a larger proportion of voles available in peak years than in low ones.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Attraction of kestrels to vole scent marks visible in ultraviolet light
Viitala, J., Korplmäki, E., Palokangas, P., & Koivula, M. (1995) · Nature · doi:10.1038/373425a0 · Cited by 377
Seasonal patterns of predation for gray wolves in the multi-prey system of Yellowstone National Park
Metz, M. C., Smith, D. W., Vucetich, J. A., Stahler, D. R., & Peterson, R. O. (2012) · Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2656.2011.01945.x · Cited by 170
Uiterwaal, S. F., Lagerstrom, I. T., Lyon, S. R., & DeLong, J. P. (2018) · doi:10.1101/503334 · Cited by 40
Metadata
- Authors
- Korpimaki, E., & Norrdahl, K.
- Venue
- Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1991-06
- Volume
- 72
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 814-826
- ISSN
- 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-9170
- OpenAlex
- W2011693763
- Cited by
- 456
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Numerical and Functional Responses of Kestrels, Short‐Eared Owls, and Long‐Eared Owls to Vole Densities. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1940584
- The paper
- Korpimaki, E., & Norrdahl, K. (1991). Numerical and Functional Responses of Kestrels, Short‐Eared Owls, and Long‐Eared Owls to Vole Densities. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/1940584
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.