The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Long‐Term Soil Water Dynamics in the Shortgrass Steppe
Abstract
To assess the temporal and spatial dynamics of soil water at a shortgrass steppe site in northcentral Colorado, we evaluated the precipitation regime for a 33—yr period and ran a simulation model for this period. Small precipitation events accounted for a large fraction of the total number of events and represented a source of water with small interannual variability. The difference between wet and dry years was related to the occurrence of a few large events. Average daily precipitation was concentrated during the warmest months of the year with a maximum in late spring. Water in the surface soil layers had a short residence time and no seasonal pattern. Intermediate layers reflected the seasonal pattern of precipitation. Maximum soil water availability occurred in the late spring, but this was also the period with the highest interannual variability. The wettest layer was at 4—15 cm of depth. The frequency of wet conditions decreased above this layer because of the strong influence of evaporation and below because recharge was infrequent. No deep percolation events were recorded. During dry years distribution of soil water was very shallow and during wet years wet conditions reached to depths of 120—135 cm. This shallow distribution of soil water matches the distribution of processes and structural elements in the steppe suggesting that there is a cause—effect relationship between them. We speculate that the pattern of water availability interacts with biotic constraints and determines the rate of ecosystem processes. The depth distribution of water in dry and wet years is compared to the root distribution of grasses, shrubs, herbs, and succulents to suggest the response of each group to modal and extreme conditions. Comparison of long—term soil water patterns and traits of the major species allows us to suggest why Bouteloua gracilis is the dominant species in the shortgrass steppe.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
DAYCENT and its land surface submodel: description and testing
Parton, W. J., Hartman, M., Ojima, D., & Schimel, D. (1998) · Global and Planetary Change · doi:10.1016/s0921-8181(98)00040-x · Cited by 865
Self-citationLong‐Term Forage Production of North American Shortgrass Steppe
Lauenroth, W. K., & Sala, O. E. (1992) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.2307/1941874 · Cited by 710
Self-citationQuantifying ecological memory in plant and ecosystem processes
Ogle, K., Barber, J. J., Barron‐Gafford, G. A., Bentley, L. P., Young, J. M., Huxman, T. E., Loik, M. E., & Tissue, D. T. (2015) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/ele.12399 · Cited by 466
Differentiating drought legacy effects on vegetation growth over the temperate Northern Hemisphere
Wu, X., Liu, H., Li, X., Ciais, P., Babst, F., Guo, W., Zhang, C., Magliulo, V., Pavelka, M., Liu, S., et al. (2018) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.13920 · Cited by 409
Kurc, S. A., & Small, E. E. (2004) · Water Resources Research · doi:10.1029/2004wr003068 · Cited by 346
Metadata
- Authors
- Sala, O. E., Lauenroth, W. K., & Parton, W. J.
- Venue
- Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1992-08
- Volume
- 73
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1175-1181
- ISSN
- 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-9170
- OpenAlex
- W2080010606
- Cited by
- 327
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 30.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Long‐Term Soil Water Dynamics in the Shortgrass Steppe. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1940667
- The paper
- Sala, O. E., Lauenroth, W. K., & Parton, W. J. (1992). Long‐Term Soil Water Dynamics in the Shortgrass Steppe. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/1940667
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.