Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 423

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Responses of Diciduous Trees to Elevated Atmospheric CO2: Productivity, Phytochemistry, and Insect Performance

Lindroth, Richard L., Kinney, Karl K., Platz, Cynthia L.·1993·Ecology

Abstract

Although rising levels of atmospheric carbon dioxide are expected to directly affect forest ecosystems, little is known of how specific ecological interactions will be modified. This research evaluated the effects of enriched CO 2 on the productivity and phytochemistry of forest trees and performance of associated insects. Our experimental system consisted of three tree species (quaking aspen [Populus tremuloides], red oak [Quercus rubra], sugar maple [Acer saccharum]) that span a range from fast to slow growing, and two species of leaf—feeding insects (gypsy moth [Lymantria dispar] and forest tent caterpillar [Malacosoma disstria]). Carbon—nutrient balance theory provided a framework for tests of three hypotheses; in response to enriched CO 2: (1) relative increases in tree growth rates will be greatest for aspen and least for maple, (2) relative decreases in protein and increases in carbon—based compounds will be greatest for aspen and least for maple, and (3) relative reductions in performance will be greatest for insects fed aspen and least for insects fed maple. We grew 1—yr—old seedlings for 60 d under ambient (385 ± 5 μL/L) or elevated (642 ± 2 μL/L) CO 2 regimes at the University of Wisconsin Biotron. After 50 d, we conducted feeding trials with penultimate—instar gypsy moth and forest tent caterpillars. After 60 d, a second set of trees was harvested and partitioned into root, stem, and leaf tissues. We subsequently analyzed leaf material for a variety of compounds known to affect performance of insect herbivores. In terms of actual dry—matter production, aspen responded the most to enriched CO 2 atmopheres whereas maple responded the least. Proportional growth increases (relative to ambient plants), however were highest for oak and lest for maple. Effects of elevated CO 2 on biomass allocation patterns differed among the three species; root—to—shoot ratios increased in aspen, decreased in oak, and did not change in maple. Enriched CO 2 altered concentrations of primary and secondary metabolites in leaves, but the magnitude and direction of effects were species—specific. Aspen showed the largest change in storage carbon compounds (starch), whereas maple experienced the largest change in defensive carbon compounds (condensed and hydrolyzable tannins). Consumption rates of insects fed high—CO 2 aspen increased dramatically, but growth rates declined. The two species of insects differed in response to oak and maple grown under enriched CO 2. Gypsy moths grew better on high—CO 2 oak, whereas forest tent caterpillars were unaffected; tent caterpillars tended to grow less on high—CO 2 maple, whereas gypsy moths were unaffected. Changes in insect performance parameters were related to changes in foliar chemistry. Responses of plants and insects agreed with some, but not all, of the predictions of carbon—nutrient balance theory. This study illustrates that tree productivity and chemistry, and the performance of associated insects, will change under CO 2 atmospheres predicted for the next century. Changes in higher level ecological processes, such as community structure and nutrient cycling, are also implicated.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/1940804

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 423

Metadata

Authors
Lindroth, R. L., Kinney, K. K., & Platz, C. L.
Venue
Ecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1993-04
Volume
74
Issue
3
Pages
763-777
ISSN
  • 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-9170
OpenAlex
W2010613025
Cited by
423
References
0
FWCI
17.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Responses of Diciduous Trees to Elevated Atmospheric CO2: Productivity, Phytochemistry, and Insect Performance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1940804
The paper
Lindroth, R. L., Kinney, K. K., & Platz, C. L. (1993). Responses of Diciduous Trees to Elevated Atmospheric CO2: Productivity, Phytochemistry, and Insect Performance. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/1940804

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.