The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Influence of Fluctuating Resources on Life History: Patterns of Allocation and Plasticity in Female Guppies
Abstract
We investigated how resources are allocated to reproduction and how variations in resource availability influence reproductive allocation, offspring number, and offspring size in guppies (Poecilia reticulata). Our goal was to evaluate how plastic these variables are in response to environmental variation and to characterize the nature of this plasticity. Female guppies which had just given birth (litter 1) were assigned to either high or low levels of food availability until they gave birth to their next litter (litter 2, interval 1). They were then randomly reassigned to either high or low food with the constraint that there be equal numbers of individuals in each of four treatments: high—high, high—low, low—high, and low—low. They were maintained on this level of food availability until they produced their next litter (litter 3, interval 2). We analyzed variables that characterized the female after the birth of the third litter and the offspring in the third litter. These were two—way analyses, with intervals 1 and 2 as the main effects and high vs. low food as the levels of each effect. The qualities of the third litter were influences by both interbrood intervals, indicating that the resources used for producing the litter were derived from both intervals. Specifically, higher food availability during either interval resulted in a significant increase in the number of offspring in litter 3, independent of the size of the mother. This result indicates that the number of offspring produced in a litter will be a function of both the immediate and the past environment. Lower food during either interval resulted in an increase in the number of days between the second and third litters, indicating that, if resource availability is low, the female may delay the initiation of the next litter, allowing her to acquire more resources. Resource availability during both intervals also influences how resources were allocated to individual offspring. Females responded to low food during the first interbrood interval by producing heavier offspring in litter 3. This increase in mass was almost entirely attributable to an increase in fat reserves. Such a result could represent adaptive plasticity, if it can be demonstrated that maternal fitness increases through the production of heavier offspring a low—food environment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The physiology of life history trade-offs in animals
Zera, A. J., & Harshman, L. G. (2001) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.32.081501.114006 · Cited by 1,577
Grande, M., Murua, H., Zudaire, I., Goñi, N., & Bodin, N. (2014) · Fisheries Research · doi:10.1016/j.fishres.2014.04.011 · Cited by 48
Metadata
- Authors
- Reznick, D., & Yang, A. P.
- Venue
- Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1993-10
- Volume
- 74
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 2011-2019
- ISSN
- 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-9170
- OpenAlex
- W2044773609
- Cited by
- 279
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Influence of Fluctuating Resources on Life History: Patterns of Allocation and Plasticity in Female Guppies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1940844
- The paper
- Reznick, D., & Yang, A. P. (1993). The Influence of Fluctuating Resources on Life History: Patterns of Allocation and Plasticity in Female Guppies. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/1940844
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.