The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Rainfall, Biomass Variation, and Community Composition in the Park Grass Experiment
Abstract
We used data on grassland plant community composition over a 90—yr period in the history of the Park Grass Experiment, England to look for relationship between variation in composition and annual variation in rainfall and biomass. This was investigated by regressions of biomass and rainfall on each other, and of these variables separately on each of three different measures of variation in plant community composition. Two of these measures, principal components analysis scores based on variation in species abundance and the ratio by mass of nongrass/grass species, showed significant relationships with biomass variation on many experimental plots, although relationships with rainfall were relatively slight or nonexistent. The third measure employed similarity indices to detect changes in species composition in response to variation in biomass, but failed to find any. Biomass was significantly increased by rainfall on all plots. We propose that variation in community composition was more closely related to biomass variation than to rainfall because rainfall selectively favored the grasses in the community, which we believe competed asymmetrically (for light) with the other species when rainfall was high. The severity of this competition would depend upon biomass more directly than upon rainfall, although it is rainfall that enhanced grass growth. In effect, asymmetric competition magnified the effect of rainfall on community composition.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Hidden treatments in ecological experiments: re-evaluating the ecosystem function of biodiversity
Huston, M. A. (1997) · Oecologia · doi:10.1007/s004420050180 · Cited by 1,772
Functional- and abundance-based mechanisms explain diversity loss due to N fertilization
Suding, K. N., Collins, S. L., Gough, L., Clark, C., Cleland, E. E., Gross, K. L., Milchunas, D. G., & Pennings, S. (2005) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0408648102 · Cited by 1,053
The Park Grass Experiment 1856-2006: Its contribution to ecology
SILVERTOWN, J., POULTON, P., JOHNSTON, E., EDWARDS, G., HEARD, M., & BISS, P. M. (2006) · Journal of Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2745.2006.01145.x · Cited by 461
Self-citationLiu, L., Sayer, E. J., Deng, M., Li, P., Liu, W., Wang, X., Yang, S., Huang, J., Luo, J., Su, Y., et al. (2023) · Fundamental Research · doi:10.1016/j.fmre.2022.09.028 · Cited by 142
Metadata
- Authors
- Silvertown, J., Dodd, M. E., McConway, K., Potts, J., & Crawley, M.
- Venue
- Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1994-12
- Volume
- 75
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 2430-2437
- ISSN
- 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-9170
- OpenAlex
- W2142460556
- Cited by
- 190
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Rainfall, Biomass Variation, and Community Composition in the Park Grass Experiment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1940896
- The paper
- Silvertown, J., Dodd, M. E., McConway, K., Potts, J., & Crawley, M. (1994). Rainfall, Biomass Variation, and Community Composition in the Park Grass Experiment. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/1940896
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
