Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 357

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Nitrogen Limitation of Production and Decomposition in Prairie, Mountain Meadow, and Pine Forest

Hunt, H. W., Ingham, E. R., Coleman, D. C., Elliott, E. T., Reid, C. P. P.·1988·Ecology

Abstract

The responses of decomposition and primary production to nitrogen supply were investigated in a shortgrass prairie, a mountain meadow, and a lodgepole pine forest. Nitrogen (N) supply was increased by applying ammonium nitrate, or decreased by applying sucrose. The litterbag technique was used to follow decomposition of leaves of the dominant plants: blue grama (Bouteloua gracilis) from the prairie, western wheatgrass (Agropyron smithii) from the meadow, and lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta) from the forest. Soil from beneath the litterbags was sampled at the time of litterbag retrieval in order to detect interactions between decomposition and properties of the underlying soil. There was no consistent effect of soil properties on decomposition rate, but there was a significant effect of litter type on N mineralization in the underlying soil. Decomposition was fastest in the forest, intermediate in the prairie, and slowest in the meadow. Blue grama decomposed faster than the other litters. Each litter type decomposed faster than expected when placed in its ecosystem of origin. This interaction suggests that decomposers in an ecosystem are adapted to the most prevalent types of litter. Nitrogen supply had a small but significant effect on decomposition rate. Within an ecosystem, there was a positive association between decomposition and accumulation of N within the litter, but this relationship was reversed when comparing across ecosystems, possibly because of the overriding effects of differences among ecosystems in abiotic factors. Aboveground net primary production was estimated in the grasslands by a single harvest at the end of the growing season, and growth increment of boles was measured in the forest. These indices of primary production showed a greater relative response to N fertilization than did decomposition, suggesting that primary production is the more N—limited process.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/1941256

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 357

Metadata

Authors
Hunt, H. W., Ingham, E. R., Coleman, D. C., Elliott, E. T., & Reid, C. P. P.
Venue
Ecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1988-08
Volume
69
Issue
4
Pages
1009-1016
ISSN
  • 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-9170
OpenAlex
W2113950208
Cited by
357
References
2
FWCI
8.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nitrogen Limitation of Production and Decomposition in Prairie, Mountain Meadow, and Pine Forest. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1941256
The paper
Hunt, H. W., Ingham, E. R., Coleman, D. C., Elliott, E. T., & Reid, C. P. P. (1988). Nitrogen Limitation of Production and Decomposition in Prairie, Mountain Meadow, and Pine Forest. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/1941256

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.