The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Fertility and Disturbance Gradients: A Summary Model For Riverine Marsh Vegetation
Abstract
Although freshwater shorelines occupy extensive areas of the temperate zone, we still have few conceptual models for pattern and process in shoreline vegetation. This study uses multivariate vegetation data to describe vegetation—environment relationships in a set of riverine wetlands and then explores general relationships between pattern and process. Samples were collected from five marshes along the Ottawa River (eastern Canada) (n = 94 sample units). Detrended correspondence analysis was used to described major gradients, and TRWINSPAN was used to classify vegetation types. TWINSPAN produced four major classes dominated by Sparganium eurycarpum, Eleocharis smallii, Scirpus americanus, and Typha latifolia. Within each class, two associations could be recognized, differing in the degree to which one species managed to dominate the vegetation. Ordination showed that these vegetation types were arranged along two major axes: a standing crop and litter gradient, and a water depth gradient. Species richness was greatest just above the late August waterline in Eleocharis smallii vegetation that had low fertility, intermediate total biomass (250g/m 2) and low littermass (30 g/m 2). Very high biomass (>400g/m 2) was observed where indices of high fertility and low disturbance coincided. Low species richness in this Typha—dominated vegetation is thought to be a result of competitive exclusion. Exposure to waves, ice, and flowing water produced a fertility gradient. The least fertile sites had small evergreen species such as Eriocaulon septangulare and Ranunculus flammula. These species possessed traits associated with Grime's "stress tolerator" strategy. The three main factors controlling vegetation competition were water depth, the effects of spring flooding in removing litter, and the fertility gradient produced by waves and flowing water. These were incorporated into a conceptual model including both patterns and processes observed along the Ottawa River.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A General Hypothesis of Species Diversity
Huston, M. (1979) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/283366 · Cited by 3,390
Cited by
Poff, N. L. (1997) · Journal of the North American Benthological Society · doi:10.2307/1468026 · Cited by 1,833
Energy and Large-Scale Patterns of Animal- and Plant-Species Richness
Currie, D. J. (1991) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/285144 · Cited by 1,753
The Relationship Between Productivity and Species Richness
Waide, R. B., Willig, M. R., Steiner, C. F., Mittelbach, G., Gough, L., Dodson, S. I., Juday, G. P., & Parmenter, R. (1999) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.30.1.257 · Cited by 1,358
Corenblit, D., Tabacchi, E., Steiger, J., & Gurnell, A. M. (2007) · Earth-Science Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2007.05.004 · Cited by 721
The factors controlling species density in herbaceous plant communities: an assessment
Grace, J. B. (1999) · Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics · doi:10.1078/1433-8319-00063 · Cited by 558
Metadata
- Authors
- Day, R. T., Keddy, P. A., McNeill, J., & Carleton, T.
- Venue
- Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1988-08
- Volume
- 69
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1044-1054
- ISSN
- 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-9170
- OpenAlex
- W2325698072
- Cited by
- 278
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 15.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fertility and Disturbance Gradients: A Summary Model For Riverine Marsh Vegetation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1941260
- The paper
- Day, R. T., Keddy, P. A., McNeill, J., & Carleton, T. (1988). Fertility and Disturbance Gradients: A Summary Model For Riverine Marsh Vegetation. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/1941260
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.