Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 278

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Fertility and Disturbance Gradients: A Summary Model For Riverine Marsh Vegetation

Day, R. T., Keddy, P. A., McNeill, J., Carleton, T.·1988·Ecology

Abstract

Although freshwater shorelines occupy extensive areas of the temperate zone, we still have few conceptual models for pattern and process in shoreline vegetation. This study uses multivariate vegetation data to describe vegetation—environment relationships in a set of riverine wetlands and then explores general relationships between pattern and process. Samples were collected from five marshes along the Ottawa River (eastern Canada) (n = 94 sample units). Detrended correspondence analysis was used to described major gradients, and TRWINSPAN was used to classify vegetation types. TWINSPAN produced four major classes dominated by Sparganium eurycarpum, Eleocharis smallii, Scirpus americanus, and Typha latifolia. Within each class, two associations could be recognized, differing in the degree to which one species managed to dominate the vegetation. Ordination showed that these vegetation types were arranged along two major axes: a standing crop and litter gradient, and a water depth gradient. Species richness was greatest just above the late August waterline in Eleocharis smallii vegetation that had low fertility, intermediate total biomass (250g/m 2) and low littermass (30 g/m 2). Very high biomass (>400g/m 2) was observed where indices of high fertility and low disturbance coincided. Low species richness in this Typha—dominated vegetation is thought to be a result of competitive exclusion. Exposure to waves, ice, and flowing water produced a fertility gradient. The least fertile sites had small evergreen species such as Eriocaulon septangulare and Ranunculus flammula. These species possessed traits associated with Grime's "stress tolerator" strategy. The three main factors controlling vegetation competition were water depth, the effects of spring flooding in removing litter, and the fertility gradient produced by waves and flowing water. These were incorporated into a conceptual model including both patterns and processes observed along the Ottawa River.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/1941260

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 278

Metadata

Authors
Day, R. T., Keddy, P. A., McNeill, J., & Carleton, T.
Venue
Ecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1988-08
Volume
69
Issue
4
Pages
1044-1054
ISSN
  • 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-9170
OpenAlex
W2325698072
Cited by
278
References
1
FWCI
15.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fertility and Disturbance Gradients: A Summary Model For Riverine Marsh Vegetation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1941260
The paper
Day, R. T., Keddy, P. A., McNeill, J., & Carleton, T. (1988). Fertility and Disturbance Gradients: A Summary Model For Riverine Marsh Vegetation. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/1941260

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.