Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 284

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Hydrochory and Regeneration in A Bald Cypress‐Water Tupelo Swamp Forest

Schneider, Rebecca L., Sharitz, Rebecca R.·1988·Ecology

Abstract

The importance of hydrochory, or seed dispersal by water, to the regeneration of Taxodium distichum (bald cypress) and Nyssa aquatica (water tupelo) as examined in a forested floodplain of the Savannah River in South Carolina. Seedfall and dispersal by water were quantified for 2 yr using floating seed traps. Water depth, surface velocity, and flow direction were monitored over the same period. Seedfall for bald cypress and water tupelo occurred primarily from early fall throughout the winter, when water levels were rising in the swamp. Extended buoyancy periods for newly released seeds and fruits (bald cypress: 42 ± 37 d; water tupelo: 85 ± 36 d) prolonged dispersal for both species. Flowing water transported experimentally released seeds long distances, but in a uniform direction, and concentrated them nonrandomly against logs, trees, knees, and other emergent substrates. An examination of the soil seed banks in five microsite types supported the results of the seed transport study. Lowest woody seed densities occurred in the open areas, and highest seed densities occurred in sediments adjacent to emergent substrates such as logs. Additionally, elevated water levels of 1—2 m caused by short—term, high—discharge floods scoured seeds of Nyssa sylvatica var. biflora, Quercus spp., Liquidambar styraciflua, Pinus taeda, and other species from adjacent bottomland hardwood communities and transported them into the bald cypress—water tupelo forest. We conclude that elevated water levels, which occur during late fall when seeds are released, influence the distribution of bald cypress and water tupelo seeds and their availability for recruitment. Short—term, deeper floods may also be important for seed transport among bottomland hardwood communities that are spatially separated or differ in species composition.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/1941261

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 284

Metadata

Authors
Schneider, R. L., & Sharitz, R. R.
Venue
Ecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1988-08
Volume
69
Issue
4
Pages
1055-1063
ISSN
  • 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-9170
OpenAlex
W2055479388
Cited by
284
References
0
FWCI
6.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Hydrochory and Regeneration in A Bald Cypress‐Water Tupelo Swamp Forest. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1941261
The paper
Schneider, R. L., & Sharitz, R. R. (1988). Hydrochory and Regeneration in A Bald Cypress‐Water Tupelo Swamp Forest. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/1941261

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.