The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Hydrochory and Regeneration in A Bald Cypress‐Water Tupelo Swamp Forest
Abstract
The importance of hydrochory, or seed dispersal by water, to the regeneration of Taxodium distichum (bald cypress) and Nyssa aquatica (water tupelo) as examined in a forested floodplain of the Savannah River in South Carolina. Seedfall and dispersal by water were quantified for 2 yr using floating seed traps. Water depth, surface velocity, and flow direction were monitored over the same period. Seedfall for bald cypress and water tupelo occurred primarily from early fall throughout the winter, when water levels were rising in the swamp. Extended buoyancy periods for newly released seeds and fruits (bald cypress: 42 ± 37 d; water tupelo: 85 ± 36 d) prolonged dispersal for both species. Flowing water transported experimentally released seeds long distances, but in a uniform direction, and concentrated them nonrandomly against logs, trees, knees, and other emergent substrates. An examination of the soil seed banks in five microsite types supported the results of the seed transport study. Lowest woody seed densities occurred in the open areas, and highest seed densities occurred in sediments adjacent to emergent substrates such as logs. Additionally, elevated water levels of 1—2 m caused by short—term, high—discharge floods scoured seeds of Nyssa sylvatica var. biflora, Quercus spp., Liquidambar styraciflua, Pinus taeda, and other species from adjacent bottomland hardwood communities and transported them into the bald cypress—water tupelo forest. We conclude that elevated water levels, which occur during late fall when seeds are released, influence the distribution of bald cypress and water tupelo seeds and their availability for recruitment. Short—term, deeper floods may also be important for seed transport among bottomland hardwood communities that are spatially separated or differ in species composition.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Ecology of Interfaces: Riparian Zones
Naiman, R. J., & Décamps, H. (1997) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.28.1.621 · Cited by 2,791
Woodland Expansions in the Platte River, Nebraska: Patterns and Causes
Johnson, W. C. (1994) · Ecological Monographs · doi:10.2307/2937055 · Cited by 549
GREET, J., ANGUS WEBB, J., & COUSENS, R. D. (2011) · Freshwater Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2427.2011.02564.x · Cited by 121
Metadata
- Authors
- Schneider, R. L., & Sharitz, R. R.
- Venue
- Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1988-08
- Volume
- 69
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1055-1063
- ISSN
- 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-9170
- OpenAlex
- W2055479388
- Cited by
- 284
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Hydrochory and Regeneration in A Bald Cypress‐Water Tupelo Swamp Forest. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1941261
- The paper
- Schneider, R. L., & Sharitz, R. R. (1988). Hydrochory and Regeneration in A Bald Cypress‐Water Tupelo Swamp Forest. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/1941261
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.