The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Interaction Between Food Availability and Predation Mortality Mediated by Adaptive Behavior
Abstract
Increased activity rates in larval anurans rates are associated with both higher growth rates and higher predation mortality. Models of adaptive foraging behavior in the face of predation risk predict that at higher resource levels, foraging activity should be reduced. Thus, at higher resource levels predation mortality should also be reduced. We manipulated the resources available to Rana catesbeiana tadpoles and then measured the activity of tadpoles in the presence of caged dragonfly larvae and the mortality rate of the tadpoles when the dragonflies were free to forage. At low food levels the tadpoles moved more often and more quickly. Similarly, at low food levels the tadpoles suffered higher predation mortality. The dependence of predation mortality on resources available to prey underlines the futility of characterizing population regulation as being due to predation or resources. Adaptive variation in behavior responds to both pressures simultaneously. These results suggest the possibility that adaptive variation in behavior may lead to density—dependent population regulation. Density—dependent depletion of resources by prey should lead to increased activity levels, which will result in higher per capita predation rates. The generality of the trade—off between growth rate and mortality rate argues that this mechanism may be widespread. If adaptive variation in behavior is as widespread as it appears, incorporating this variation into population dynamic modelling may improve our ability to predict the outcome of interactions within ecological communities.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Peckarsky, B. L., Abrams, P. A., Bolnick, D. I., Dill, L. M., Grabowski, J. H., Luttbeg, B., Orrock, J. L., Peacor, S. D., Preisser, E. L., Schmitz, O. J., et al. (2008) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/07-1131.1 · Cited by 527
“Key words: behavior; consumptive effects; keystone predators; nonconsumptive effects; predator–prey cycles and interactions; trait-mediated indirect effects; trophic cascades.”
BackgroundInfluentialECOLOGICAL PROCESSES UNDERLYING ONTOGENETIC HABITAT SHIFTS IN A CORAL REEF FISH
Dahlgren, C. P., & Eggleston, D. B. (2000) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/0012-9658(2000)081[2227:epuohs]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 441
FINE-TUNED PHENOTYPES: TADPOLE PLASTICITY UNDER 16 COMBINATIONS OF PREDATORS AND COMPETITORS
Relyea, R. A. (2004) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/03-0169 · Cited by 355
Predators select against high growth rates and risk–taking behaviour in domestic trout populations
Biro, P. A., Abrahams, M. V., Post, J. R., & Parkinson, E. A. (2004) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2004.2861 · Cited by 313
Chemical Detection of Natural Enemies by Arthropods: An Ecological Perspective
Dicke, M., & Grostal, P. (2001) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.32.081501.113951 · Cited by 284
Metadata
- Authors
- Anholt, B. R., & Werner, E. E.
- Venue
- Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1995-10
- Volume
- 76
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 2230-2234
- ISSN
- 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-9170
- OpenAlex
- W1974676440
- Cited by
- 387
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Interaction Between Food Availability and Predation Mortality Mediated by Adaptive Behavior. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1941696
- The paper
- Anholt, B. R., & Werner, E. E. (1995). Interaction Between Food Availability and Predation Mortality Mediated by Adaptive Behavior. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/1941696
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.