The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Metapopulation Structure and Migration in the Butterfly Melitaea Cinxia
Abstract
We describe a spatially realistic metapopulation model and parameterize it for a metapopulation of the butterfly Melitaea cinxia, residing in a network of 50 discrete habitat patches within an area of 15 km 2. Parameter values that are difficult to estimate independently are obtained by fitting the model to patterns of patch occupancy and local density. There is no large "mainland" population, and the metapopulation appears to survive at an extinction—colonization equilibrium. Empty patches were smaller than the occupied ones, indicating the extinction proneness of especially small local populations; population turnover was 16% between 2 yr. Density in the occupied patches increased with decreasing isolation and with decreasing patch area, suggesting that migration plays an important role in local dynamics. Mark—recapture results confirmed that migration between local populations was common, in contrast to what is frequently assumed for butterflies with well—defined local populations in discrete habitat patches. The modelling results demonstrate that it is possible to have empty habitat patches in a metapopulation in spite of frequent migration, as we observed for M. cinxia. Colonization rate of empty patches may be low for several reasons, including difficulties in mate location at low density (not likely to be important here), conspecific attraction (possibly important), stepping—stone and other forms of nonrandom migration (likely to be important), and weak density dependence (likely to be important). Our results support the assumptions of structured metapopulation models, which demonstrate the possibility of alternative stable equilibria for metapopulations in which migration significantly affects local dynamics.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A Practical Model of Metapopulation Dynamics
Hanski, I. (1994) · The Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.2307/5591 · Cited by 1,640
Self-citationWhich traits of species predict population declines in experimental forest fragments?
Davies, K. F., Margules, C. R., & Lawrence, J. F. (2000) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/0012-9658(2000)081[1450:wtospp]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 444
Minimum viable metapopulation size
Hanski, I., Moilanen, A., & Gyllenberg, M. (1996) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/285864 · Cited by 399
Self-citationA synergistic effect puts rare, specialized species at greater risk of extinction
Davies, K. F., Margules, C. R., & Lawrence, J. F. (2004) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/03-0110 · Cited by 337
Functional connectivity as an indicator for patch occupancy in grassland specialists
Poniatowski, D., Löffler, F., Stuhldreher, G., Borchard, F., Krämer, B., & Fartmann, T. (2016) · Ecological Indicators · doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.03.047 · Cited by 33
Metadata
- Authors
- Hanski, I., Kuussaari, M., & Nieminen, M.
- Venue
- Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1994-04
- Volume
- 75
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 747-762
- ISSN
- 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-9170
- OpenAlex
- W2317113836
- Cited by
- 448
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 24.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Metapopulation Structure and Migration in the Butterfly Melitaea Cinxia. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1941732
- The paper
- Hanski, I., Kuussaari, M., & Nieminen, M. (1994). Metapopulation Structure and Migration in the Butterfly Melitaea Cinxia. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/1941732
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.