The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Assessing the Indicator Properties of Species Assemblages for Natural Areas Monitoring
Abstract
The diversity of organisms and complexity of ecosystems prevent through inventory and monitoring of protected areas, yet sound databases are needed to manage ecosystems for long—term persistence. One strategy is therefore to focus monitoring on indicator organisms, but guidelines are lacking for selecting appropriate species or groups. This paper presents a simple protocol based on ordination techniques for establishing the indicator properties of a group of organisms and for selecting an indicator species subset for more intensive monitoring. Use of ordination allows inclusion of many more taxa than have been traditionally used for natural areas monitoring, and need not rely on detailed knowledge of species biology. As an example, I studied the indicator properties of a butterfly taxocene in a rain forest in Madagascar. Butterflies have been suggested as particularly good environmental indicators due to their sensitivity to micro—climate and light level changes, and their interactions as larvae and adults with different sets of host plants. The indicator properties of butterfly assemblages were evaluated in this study with respect to a known pattern of environmental heterogeneity along topographic/moisture and disturbance gradients. Butterfly assemblages were found to be excellent indicators of heterogeneity due to the topographic/moisture gradient, limited indicators of heterogeneity due to anthropogenic disturbance, and poor indicators of plant diversity. The protocol defined in this study is widely applicable to other groups of organisms, spatial scales, and environmental gradients. By examining the environmental correlates of the distribution of species assemblages, this protocol can assess the indicator properties of target species groups.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Simplified estimators for the normal distribution when samples are singly censored or truncated
Cohen, A. C. (1959) · Technometrics · doi:10.1080/00401706.1959.10489859 · Cited by 425
Cited by
Dung beetles as indicators of change in the forests of northern Borneo
Davis, A. J., Holloway, J. D., Huijbregts, H., Krikken, J., Kirk‐Spriggs, A. H., & Sutton, S. L. (2001) · Journal of Applied Ecology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2664.2001.00619.x · Cited by 342
National park and reserve planning to protect biological diversity: some basic elements
Shafer, C. L. (1999) · Landscape and Urban Planning · doi:10.1016/s0169-2046(98)00115-7 · Cited by 92
Metadata
- Authors
- Kremen, C.
- Venue
- Ecological Applications
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1992-05
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 203-217
- ISSN
- 1051-0761 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-5582
- OpenAlex
- W2052655283
- Cited by
- 599
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 16.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Assessing the Indicator Properties of Species Assemblages for Natural Areas Monitoring. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1941776
- The paper
- Kremen, C. (1992). Assessing the Indicator Properties of Species Assemblages for Natural Areas Monitoring. Ecological Applications. https://doi.org/10.2307/1941776
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.