The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Breeding Success of Hatchery and Wild Coho Salmon (Oncorhynchus Kisutch) in Competition
Abstract
The divergence of hatchery fish in traits important for reproductive success has raised concerns about their ability to rehabilitate wild populations, and the threat that their inevitable straying poses to biological diversity through introgression. We therefore undertook a study of the breeding competition and success of sea—ranched hatchery fish placed in direct competition with wild fish. Experiments using wild and hatchery coho salmo (Oncorhynchus kisutch) were conducted within a controlled stream channel, allowing selective manipulation of breeding competition and density. Hatchery fish, particularly males, were competitively inferior to wild fish, being less aggressive and more submissive. As a consequence, hatchery males were denied access to ovipositing females; they partook in fewer spawnings, held more distal positions in spawning hierarchies, and attained only an estimated 62% of the breeding success of wild males. By contrast, competition did not appear to inhibit hatchery females as overtly as males. Hatchery and wild females exhibited similar levels of aggressive behavior, however hatchery females did suffer greater delays in the onset of breeding, failed to spawn larger proportions of their eggs, and lost more eggs to nest destruction by other females. They averaged an estimated 82% of the breeding success of wild females. There was thus a sex bias in the breeding disadvantage of hatchery fish, with males suffering more than females. Furthermore, the breeding disadvantage was density dependent with the relative success of hatchery to wild fish declining with increasing density. These results imply that hatchery fish have restricted abilities to rehabilitate wild populations, and may pose ecological and genetic threats to the conservation of wild populations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Limitations of Captive Breeding in Endangered Species Recovery
Snyder, N. F. R., Derrickson, S. R., Beissinger, S. R., Wiley, J. W., Smith, T. B., Toone, W. D., & Miller, B. (1996) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.1996.10020338.x · Cited by 757
Genetic adaptation to captivity in species conservation programs
FRANKHAM, R. (2008) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-294x.2007.03399.x · Cited by 648
Fitness of hatchery‐reared salmonids in the wild
Araki, H., Berejikian, B. A., Ford, M. J., & Blouin, M. S. (2008) · Evolutionary Applications · doi:10.1111/j.1752-4571.2008.00026.x · Cited by 593
Fleming, I. A., & Gross, M. R. (1994) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1994.tb01350.x · Cited by 346
Self-citationHoming and straying by anadromous salmonids: a review of mechanisms and rates
Keefer, M. L., & Caudill, C. C. (2014) · Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries · doi:10.1007/s11160-013-9334-6 · Cited by 337
Metadata
- Authors
- Fleming, I. A., & Gross, M. R.
- Venue
- Ecological Applications
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1993-05
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 230-245
- ISSN
- 1051-0761 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-5582
- OpenAlex
- W2063658473
- Cited by
- 223
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Breeding Success of Hatchery and Wild Coho Salmon (Oncorhynchus Kisutch) in Competition. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1941826
- The paper
- Fleming, I. A., & Gross, M. R. (1993). Breeding Success of Hatchery and Wild Coho Salmon (Oncorhynchus Kisutch) in Competition. Ecological Applications. https://doi.org/10.2307/1941826
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.