The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Aggregating Fine‐Scale Ecological Knowledge to Model Coarser‐Scale Attributes of Ecosystems
Abstract
As regional and global scales become more important to ecologists, methods must be developed for the application of existing fine—scale knowledge to predict coarser—scale ecosystem properties. This generally involves some form of model in which fine—scale components are aggregated. This aggregation is necessary to avoid the cumulative error associated with the estimation of a large number of parameters. However, aggregation can itself produce errors that arise because of the variation among the aggregated components. The statistical expectation operator can be used as a rigorous method for translating fine—scale relationships to coarser scales without aggregation errors. Unfortunately this method is too cumbersome to be applied in most cases, and alternative methods must be used. These alternative methods are typically partial corrections for the variation in only a few of the fine—scale attributes. Therefore, for these methods to be effective, the attributes that are the most severe sources of error must be identified a priori. We present a procedure for making these identifications based on a Monte Carlo sampling of the fine—scale attributes. We then present four methods of translating fine—scale knowledge so it can be applied at coarser scales: (1) partial transformations using the expectation operator, (2) moment expansions, (3) partitioning, and (4) calibration. These methods should make it possible to apply the vast store of fine—scale ecological knowledge to model coarser—scale attributes of ecosystems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
From Balance of Nature to Hierarchical Patch Dynamics: A Paradigm Shift in Ecology
Wu, J., & Loucks, O. L. (1995) · The Quarterly Review of Biology · doi:10.1086/419172 · Cited by 1,246
Forest Models Defined by Field Measurements: Estimation, Error Analysis and Dynamics
Pacala, S. W., Canham, C. D., Saponara, J., Silander, J. A., Kobe, R. K., & Ribbens, E. (1996) · Ecological Monographs · doi:10.2307/2963479 · Cited by 1,200
The concept of scale and the human dimensions of global change: a survey
Gibson, C. C., Ostrom, E., & Ahn, T. K. (2000) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/s0921-8009(99)00092-0 · Cited by 1,115
Land use change modelling: current practice and research priorities
Verburg, P. H., Schot, P. P., Dijst, M. J., & Veldkamp, A. (2004) · GeoJournal · doi:10.1007/s10708-004-4946-y · Cited by 1,069
Veldkamp, A., & Lambin, E. F. (2001) · Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment · doi:10.1016/s0167-8809(01)00199-2 · Cited by 955
Metadata
- Authors
- Rastetter, E. B., King, A. W., Cosby, B. J., Hornberger, G. M., O'Neill, R. V., & Hobbie, J. E.
- Venue
- Ecological Applications
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1992-02
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 55-70
- ISSN
- 1051-0761 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-5582
- OpenAlex
- W1987297716
- Cited by
- 438
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 19.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Aggregating Fine‐Scale Ecological Knowledge to Model Coarser‐Scale Attributes of Ecosystems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1941889
- The paper
- Rastetter, E. B., King, A. W., Cosby, B. J., Hornberger, G. M., O'Neill, R. V., & Hobbie, J. E. (1992). Aggregating Fine‐Scale Ecological Knowledge to Model Coarser‐Scale Attributes of Ecosystems. Ecological Applications. https://doi.org/10.2307/1941889
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.