The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Atmospheric Deposition of Nutrients and Pollutants in North America: An Ecological Perspective
Abstract
Research on air pollution and acidic deposition during the last 15 yr has greatly increased our knowledge of the rates and the processes of atmospheric deposition. The invigoration of the field has been a direct result of interchange and cooperation among ecosystem ecologists, micrometeorologists, and plant physiological ecologists who each approach the study of atmospheric deposition from different perspectives. This has led to the widespread realization among ecologists of the importance of dry and cloud deposition and the introduction of new methods to estimate these fluxes. In this paper I summarize the current understanding of atmospheric deposition processes, measurement methods, and patterns of deposition in North America. Dry deposition measurements are still highly uncertain in most cases, and methodology is still an active area of research and debate, but it seems clear that ecologists will require a suite of different methods to evaluate dry deposition fluxes of the various elements important to ecosystems. Standard model formulations have been developed for estimating dry and cloud deposition, and these models are finding wide use in flux estimation at sites where direct measurements are unavailable. National monitoring networks for wet and dry deposition have been established and are providing information on continental— and regional—scale patterns. Research has demonstrated that deposition rates are increased substantially at high—elevation sites by enhancement of wet, dry, and especially, cloud deposition. Patterns of O 3 exposure are also different at high—elevation sites. The deposition of O 3, while mechanistically similar to that of other gases, has been treated differently in the ecological and botanical literature because of its direct phytotoxicity at ambient concentrations in industrialized areas. Current efforts in ozone exposure research involve determining appropriate exposure indices for interpreting biological responses and coupling models of atmospheric transport with models of ozone disposition within the plant.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
NITROGEN DEPOSITION ONTO THE UNITED STATES AND WESTERN EUROPE: SYNTHESIS OF OBSERVATIONS AND MODELS
Holland, E. A., Braswell, B. H., Sulzman, J., & Lamarque, J.-F. (2005) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1890/03-5162 · Cited by 418
Ecosystem services and valuation of urban forests in China
Jim, C. Y., & Chen, W. Y. (2009) · Cities · doi:10.1016/j.cities.2009.03.003 · Cited by 398
Escobedo, F. J., Wagner, J. E., Nowak, D. J., De la Maza, C. L., Rodriguez, M., & Crane, D. E. (2008) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.11.029 · Cited by 323
The role of hedgerows in soil functioning within agricultural landscapes
Holden, J., Grayson, R. P., Berdeni, D., Bird, S., Chapman, P. J., Edmondson, J. L., Firbank, L. G., Helgason, T., Hodson, M. E., Hunt, S. F. P., et al. (2019) · Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment · doi:10.1016/j.agee.2018.11.027 · Cited by 140
Atmospheric deposition of toxics onto Massachusetts Bay—I. Metals
Golomb, D., Ryan, D., Eby, N., Underhill, J., & Zemba, S. (1997) · Atmospheric Environment · doi:10.1016/s1352-2310(96)00276-2 · Cited by 117
Metadata
- Authors
- Lovett, G. M.
- Venue
- Ecological Applications
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1994-11
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 629-650
- ISSN
- 1051-0761 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-5582
- OpenAlex
- W2003099721
- Cited by
- 433
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Atmospheric Deposition of Nutrients and Pollutants in North America: An Ecological Perspective. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1941997
- The paper
- Lovett, G. M. (1994). Atmospheric Deposition of Nutrients and Pollutants in North America: An Ecological Perspective. Ecological Applications. https://doi.org/10.2307/1941997
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.