Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 235

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Community‐Wide Consequences of Trout Introduction in New Zealand Streams

Flecker, Alexander S., Townsend, Colin R.·1994·Ecological Applications

Abstract

Trout provide one of the prime illustrations of the willful introduction of living organisms for recreational purposes. In New Zealand, brown trout were first liberated in the 1860s; today trout are so ubiquitous in the country that they have become enshrined in New Zealand culture. There is abundant evidence that in many streams, trout have largely replaced the indigenous galaxiid fishes. It remains unclear, however, whether their effects in stream communities have propagated through multiple trophic levels. Here we performed a pair of field experiments to compare the relative impacts of introduced and native fishes on the structure of a New Zealand stream community. We found large differences in the insect assemblages colonizing experimental channels, depending on the fish species present. In general, insect densities and biomass were lowest in channels containing trout compared to either galaxias or no fish treatments. Effects of trout on insect diversity were, however, relatively minor. The influence of fishes on insect abundance cascaded to the bottom trophic level, as algal standing crop was greatest in the presence of trout. These results suggest that the consequences of trout may extend beyond the replacement of native fish species. Although our approach allows us to ask whether the potential exists for community—wide impacts of invasive fishes, it remains unclear whether multiple trophic—level effects will be readily detectable in many ecological settings. The high degree of spatial and temporal heterogeneity common to running water systems, and the confounding effects of land—use transformations, may impede our ability to discern community—level changes following this and other species introductions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/1942009

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 235

Metadata

Authors
Flecker, A. S., & Townsend, C. R.
Venue
Ecological Applications
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1994-11
Volume
4
Issue
4
Pages
798-807
ISSN
  • 1051-0761 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-5582
OpenAlex
W2017368866
Cited by
235
References
1
FWCI
6.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Community‐Wide Consequences of Trout Introduction in New Zealand Streams. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1942009
The paper
Flecker, A. S., & Townsend, C. R. (1994). Community‐Wide Consequences of Trout Introduction in New Zealand Streams. Ecological Applications. https://doi.org/10.2307/1942009

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.