The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Community‐Wide Consequences of Trout Introduction in New Zealand Streams
Abstract
Trout provide one of the prime illustrations of the willful introduction of living organisms for recreational purposes. In New Zealand, brown trout were first liberated in the 1860s; today trout are so ubiquitous in the country that they have become enshrined in New Zealand culture. There is abundant evidence that in many streams, trout have largely replaced the indigenous galaxiid fishes. It remains unclear, however, whether their effects in stream communities have propagated through multiple trophic levels. Here we performed a pair of field experiments to compare the relative impacts of introduced and native fishes on the structure of a New Zealand stream community. We found large differences in the insect assemblages colonizing experimental channels, depending on the fish species present. In general, insect densities and biomass were lowest in channels containing trout compared to either galaxias or no fish treatments. Effects of trout on insect diversity were, however, relatively minor. The influence of fishes on insect abundance cascaded to the bottom trophic level, as algal standing crop was greatest in the presence of trout. These results suggest that the consequences of trout may extend beyond the replacement of native fish species. Although our approach allows us to ask whether the potential exists for community—wide impacts of invasive fishes, it remains unclear whether multiple trophic—level effects will be readily detectable in many ecological settings. The high degree of spatial and temporal heterogeneity common to running water systems, and the confounding effects of land—use transformations, may impede our ability to discern community—level changes following this and other species introductions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cascading Trophic Interactions and Lake Productivity
Carpenter, S. R., Kitchell, J. F., & Hodgson, J. R. (1985) · BioScience · doi:10.2307/1309989 · Cited by 2,646
Cited by
Trophic cascades revealed in diverse ecosystems
Pace, M. L., Cole, J. J., Carpenter, S. R., & Kitchell, J. F. (1999) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/s0169-5347(99)01723-1 · Cited by 1,478
McIntosh, A. R., & Townsend, C. R. (1996) · Oecologia · doi:10.1007/bf00333229 · Cited by 240
Self-citationWhitfield, P. E., Hare, J. A., David, A. W., Harter, S. L., Muñoz, R. C., & Addison, C. M. (2006) · Biological Invasions · doi:10.1007/s10530-006-9005-9 · Cited by 140
Whitfield, P. E., Hare, J. A., David, A. W., Harter, S. L., Muñoz, R. C., & Addison, C. M. (2007) · Biological Invasions · doi:10.1007/s10530-006-9063-z · Cited by 131
(2003) · AquaDocs (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization) · Cited by 89
Metadata
- Authors
- Flecker, A. S., & Townsend, C. R.
- Venue
- Ecological Applications
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1994-11
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 798-807
- ISSN
- 1051-0761 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-5582
- OpenAlex
- W2017368866
- Cited by
- 235
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Community‐Wide Consequences of Trout Introduction in New Zealand Streams. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1942009
- The paper
- Flecker, A. S., & Townsend, C. R. (1994). Community‐Wide Consequences of Trout Introduction in New Zealand Streams. Ecological Applications. https://doi.org/10.2307/1942009
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.