The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Long-Term Response of Nutrient-Limited Forests to CO"2 Enrichment; Equilibrium Behavior of Plant-Soil Models
Abstract
Established process-based models of forest biomass production in relation to atmospheric CO"2 concentration (McMurtrie 1991) and soil carbon/nutrient dynamics (Parton et al. 1987) are integrated to derive the @'Generic Decomposition and Yield@' model (G'DAY). The model is used to describe how photosynthesis and nutritional factors interact to determine the productivity of forests growing under nitrogen-limited conditions. A simulated instantaneous doubling of atmospheric CO"2 concentration leads to a growth response that is initially large (27% above productivity at current CO"2) but declines to <10% elevation within 5 yr. The decline occurs because increases in photosynthetic carbon gain at elevated CO"2 are not matched by increases in nutrient supply. Lower foliar N concentrations at elevated CO"2 have two countervailing effects on forest production: decreased rates of N cycling between vegetation and soils (with negative consequences for productivity), and reduced rates of N loss through gaseous emission, fire, and leaching. Theoretical analysis reveals that there is an enduring response to CO"2 enrichment, but that the magnitude of the long-term equilibrium response is extremely sensitive to the assumed rate of gaseous emission resulting from mineralization of nitrogen. Theory developed to analyze G'DAY is applicable to other published production-decomposition models describing the partitioning of soil carbon among compartments with widely differing decay-time constants.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Soil fertility limits carbon sequestration by forest ecosystems in a CO2-enriched atmosphere
Oren, R., Ellsworth, D. S., Johnsen, K. H., Phillips, N., Ewers, B. E., Maier, C., Schäfer, K. V. R., McCarthy, H., Hendrey, G., McNulty, S. G., et al. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35078064 · Cited by 1,084
Climatic, edaphic, and biotic controls over storage and turnover of carbon in soils
Schimel, D. S., Braswell, B. H., Holland, E. A., McKeown, R., Ojima, D. S., Painter, T. H., Parton, W. J., & Townsend, A. R. (1994) · Global Biogeochemical Cycles · doi:10.1029/94gb00993 · Cited by 1,060
Soil carbon and nitrogen mineralization: Theory and models across scales
Manzoni, S., & Porporato, A. (2009) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2009.02.031 · Cited by 788
Ecological Lessons from Free-Air CO 2 Enrichment (FACE) Experiments
Norby, R. J., & Zak, D. R. (2011) · Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-102209-144647 · Cited by 681
Net Primary Production of a Forest Ecosystem with Experimental CO 2 Enrichment
DeLucia, E. H., Hamilton, J. G., Naidu, S. L., Thomas, R. B., Andrews, J. A., Finzi, A., Lavine, M., Matamala, R., Mohan, J. E., Hendrey, G. R., et al. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.284.5417.1177 · Cited by 490
Metadata
- Authors
- Comins, H. N., & McMurtrie, R. E.
- Venue
- Ecological Applications
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1993-11
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 666-681
- ISSN
- 1051-0761 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2049490494
- Cited by
- 331
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 19.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Long-Term Response of Nutrient-Limited Forests to CO"2 Enrichment; Equilibrium Behavior of Plant-Soil Models. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1942099
- The paper
- Comins, H. N., & McMurtrie, R. E. (1993). Long-Term Response of Nutrient-Limited Forests to CO"2 Enrichment; Equilibrium Behavior of Plant-Soil Models. Ecological Applications. https://doi.org/10.2307/1942099
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.