Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 593

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Nutrient Release From Decomposing Leaf and Branch Litter in the Hubbard Brook Forest, New Hampshire

Gosz, James R., Likens, Gene E., Bormann, F. Herbert·1973·Ecological Monographs

Abstract

Rates of weight loss and nutrient release (N, P, S, K, Mn, Ca, Zn, Fe, Mn, Cu, Na) were measured in decomposing leaf and branch tissue form yellow birch, sugar maple, and beech, and in branch tissue from red spruce and balsam fir. Neither leaf nor branch decomposition differed significantly over an elevational range of 220 m. Decomposition rates for leaves varied with yellow birch > sugar maple > beech. The decomposition rate for hardwood branches was greater than that for conifer branches, but differences between hardwoods were not significant. Maximum decomposition rates occurred during the summer for both branch and leaf tissue. The rate of nutrient release from decomposing branch and leaf litter appears to be correlated with nutrient concentration in current litter fall, precipitation, and leaf wash. The concentration and absolute weight of N. S. and P in the leaf litter of all species increased with time. The amount of the increase as well as the initiation of nutrient release was influenced by C: element ratios in the leaf tissue. These studies also indicate that P levels can influence the mineralization or immobilization of other important nutrients. Carbon—to—element ratios in decomposing litter varied between species and elevation at different times of the year, but element: P ratios were much more uniform. In branch tissue the physical loss of N— and P—rich bark and buds offset any increase in concentration that would have occurred through decomposition. Potassium and magnesium were rapidly released from the litter by leaching. Similar minimum concentrations in leaf tissue indicate that critical C: element ratios also exist for these elements. Calcium release was similar to dry weight loss, indicating that it is a structural component primarily released by decomposition. Maximum nutrient release from current litter occurred in the autumn and summer. It was not correlated with the nutrient output from the ecosystem which occurred primarily during the spring. The net output of Ca, Mg, and K from the watershed was very small compared to quantities released from current litter. Factors which contribute to the complex nature of decomposition are: seasonal heterotroph activity, heterotroph nutrient demand, environmental conditions regulations heterotroph activity, species tissue palatability, species composition of litter, tissue composition of litter, nutrient content of litter, nutrient mobility, and nutrient input (i.e., leafwash, litter fall).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/1942193

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 593

Metadata

Authors
Gosz, J. R., Likens, G. E., & Bormann, F. H.
Venue
Ecological Monographs
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1973-03
Volume
43
Issue
2
Pages
173-191
ISSN
  • 0012-9615 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-7015
OpenAlex
W2157883338
Cited by
593
References
0
FWCI
26.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nutrient Release From Decomposing Leaf and Branch Litter in the Hubbard Brook Forest, New Hampshire. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1942193
The paper
Gosz, J. R., Likens, G. E., & Bormann, F. H. (1973). Nutrient Release From Decomposing Leaf and Branch Litter in the Hubbard Brook Forest, New Hampshire. Ecological Monographs. https://doi.org/10.2307/1942193

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.