The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Energy Flow in Bear Brook, New Hampshire: An Integrative Approach to Stream Ecosystem Metabolism
Abstract
An annual energy budget is presented for Bear Brook, a small undisturbed second—order stream in northeastern United States. The ecosystem approach, in which all input and output fluxes of potential energy as organic matter are considered, is used to describe the dynamics of energy flow in a 1,700—m segment of the stream. The annual input of energy to the system is 6,039 Kcal/m 2. Over 99% of this is allochthonous, from the surrounding forested watershed or from upstream areas. Autochthonous primary production by mosses accounts for less than 1% of the total energy available to the ecosystem. Algae and vascular hydrophytes are absent from the stream. Meteorologic inputs (litter and throughfall) from the adjacent forest account for 44% of annual energy input. Most of this is in particulate form. The remaining 56% of input enters by geologic vectors (inflowing surface and subsurface waters). Eighty—three per cent of the geologic input and 47% of the total input of energy occur as dissolved organic matter. Approximately 4,730 Kcal/m 2 of organic detritus, nearly equally divided between leaves and branches, is stored within the system. The size of this detritus reservoir is stable from year to year. The turnover time of the branch compartment is about 4.2 years; of the leaf compartment, about 1 year. Although much of the annual input of energy is in a dissolved state, dissolved organic matter does not tend to accumulate in the system and displays a very rapid rate of turnover. Sixty—six per cent of annual energy input is exported to downstream areas in stream water. The remaining 34% is lost as heat through consumer activity. Bear Brook is a strongly heterotrophic steady—state system in which import and export of organic matter play a significant role. A conceptual scheme is presented by which import, export, photosynthesis, and respiration may be used to describe the functional dynamics and developmental processes of ecosystems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
An Ecosystem Perspective of Riparian Zones
Gregory, S. V., Swanson, F. J., McKee, W. A., & Cummins, K. W. (1991) · BioScience · doi:10.2307/1311607 · Cited by 2,460
Structure and Function of Stream Ecosystems
Cummins, K. W. (1974) · BioScience · doi:10.2307/1296676 · Cited by 1,413
The Role of Macroinvertebrates in Stream Ecosystem Function
Wallace, J. B., & Webster, J. R. (1996) · Annual Review of Entomology · doi:10.1146/annurev.en.41.010196.000555 · Cited by 1,163
Threats to the running water ecosystems of the world
Malmqvist, B., & Rundle, S. (2002) · Environmental Conservation · doi:10.1017/s0376892902000097 · Cited by 1,047
Compositions and fluxes of particulate organic material in the Amazon River1
Hedges, J. I., Clark, W. A., Quay, P. D., Richey, J. E., Devol, A. H., & Santos, M. (1986) · Limnology and Oceanography · doi:10.4319/lo.1986.31.4.0717 · Cited by 842
Metadata
- Authors
- Fisher, S. G., & Likens, G. E.
- Venue
- Ecological Monographs
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1973-09
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 421-439
- ISSN
- 0012-9615 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-7015
- OpenAlex
- W1969358666
- Cited by
- 1,391
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Energy Flow in Bear Brook, New Hampshire: An Integrative Approach to Stream Ecosystem Metabolism. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1942301
- The paper
- Fisher, S. G., & Likens, G. E. (1973). Energy Flow in Bear Brook, New Hampshire: An Integrative Approach to Stream Ecosystem Metabolism. Ecological Monographs. https://doi.org/10.2307/1942301
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.