The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Biological Accommodation in the Benthic Community at McMurdo Sound, Antarctica
Abstract
Studies of the benthos between 30 and 60 m at Cape Armitage, McMurdo Sound. Antarctica, reveal an epifaunal community in which sponges and their asteroid and nudibranch predators predominate. Field experiments demonstrated that, with the exception of Mycale accrata, the growth rates of the sponges are too slow to measure in one year. Mycale, however, was observed to increase its mass as much as 67%. Because of its more rapid growth rate, Mycale appears to be the potential dominant in competition for substratum space, the resource potentially limiting to the sessile species. This conclusion is supported by observations of Mycale growing over and, in some cases, apparently having smothered many other sessile species representing at least three phyla. The densities and size frequency distributions of all the predators were measured; numerous feeding observations allowed an accurate appraisal of dietary compositions. Because of the predators' very slow consumption rates, however, direct measures of ingestion and its impact on prey populations were not possible. Estimates of the ingestion rates were derived from measurements of predator respiration rates, growth rates, and gonad growth. Data from the field surveys and the energetics studies suggest that Mycale is prevented from dominating the space resource by the predation of two asteroids. Perknaster fuscus antarcticus and Acodontaster conspicuus. Adult Perknaster specialize on Mycale, and the sponge provides a small proportion of the diet of A. conspicuus. Acodontaster conspicuus and the dorid nudibranch Austrodoris memurdensis are the most important predators on three species of rossellid sponges (Rossella racovitzae, R. nuda, and Scolymastra joubini). Despite this relatively heavy consumption and despite the fact that none of these sponges has a refuge in growth from potential mortality from A. conspicuus, very large standing crops of the rossellid sponges have accumulated. This accumulation appears to result from predation on larval and young A. conspicuus and Austrodoris by Odontaster validus, which is primarily a detrital feeder and apparently acts as a filter against the settlement and survival of the A. conspicuus and Austrodoris larvae. In addition, predation upon adult A. conspicuus by O. validus and the actinian urticinopsis antarcticus annually kills approximately 3.5% of the A. conspicuus population. This mortality exceeds the apparent rate at which A. conspicuus escape the larval filter.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The functional roles of marine sponges
Bell, J. J. (2008) · Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science · doi:10.1016/j.ecss.2008.05.002 · Cited by 760
Mehbub, M., Lei, J., Franco, C., & Zhang, W. (2014) · Marine Drugs · doi:10.3390/md12084539 · Cited by 417
Nutrient Fluxes Through Sponges
Maldonado, M., Ribes, M., & van Duyl, F. C. (2012) · Advances in Marine Biology · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-394283-8.00003-5 · Cited by 306
Metadata
- Authors
- Dayton, P. K., Robilliard, G. A., Paine, R. T., & Dayton, L. B.
- Venue
- Ecological Monographs
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1974-01
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 105-128
- ISSN
- 0012-9615 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-7015
- OpenAlex
- W2091777825
- Cited by
- 704
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Biological Accommodation in the Benthic Community at McMurdo Sound, Antarctica. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1942321
- The paper
- Dayton, P. K., Robilliard, G. A., Paine, R. T., & Dayton, L. B. (1974). Biological Accommodation in the Benthic Community at McMurdo Sound, Antarctica. Ecological Monographs. https://doi.org/10.2307/1942321
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.