Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 704

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Biological Accommodation in the Benthic Community at McMurdo Sound, Antarctica

Dayton, Paul K., Robilliard, Gordon A., Paine, Robert T., Dayton, Linnea B.·1974·Ecological Monographs

Abstract

Studies of the benthos between 30 and 60 m at Cape Armitage, McMurdo Sound. Antarctica, reveal an epifaunal community in which sponges and their asteroid and nudibranch predators predominate. Field experiments demonstrated that, with the exception of Mycale accrata, the growth rates of the sponges are too slow to measure in one year. Mycale, however, was observed to increase its mass as much as 67%. Because of its more rapid growth rate, Mycale appears to be the potential dominant in competition for substratum space, the resource potentially limiting to the sessile species. This conclusion is supported by observations of Mycale growing over and, in some cases, apparently having smothered many other sessile species representing at least three phyla. The densities and size frequency distributions of all the predators were measured; numerous feeding observations allowed an accurate appraisal of dietary compositions. Because of the predators' very slow consumption rates, however, direct measures of ingestion and its impact on prey populations were not possible. Estimates of the ingestion rates were derived from measurements of predator respiration rates, growth rates, and gonad growth. Data from the field surveys and the energetics studies suggest that Mycale is prevented from dominating the space resource by the predation of two asteroids. Perknaster fuscus antarcticus and Acodontaster conspicuus. Adult Perknaster specialize on Mycale, and the sponge provides a small proportion of the diet of A. conspicuus. Acodontaster conspicuus and the dorid nudibranch Austrodoris memurdensis are the most important predators on three species of rossellid sponges (Rossella racovitzae, R. nuda, and Scolymastra joubini). Despite this relatively heavy consumption and despite the fact that none of these sponges has a refuge in growth from potential mortality from A. conspicuus, very large standing crops of the rossellid sponges have accumulated. This accumulation appears to result from predation on larval and young A. conspicuus and Austrodoris by Odontaster validus, which is primarily a detrital feeder and apparently acts as a filter against the settlement and survival of the A. conspicuus and Austrodoris larvae. In addition, predation upon adult A. conspicuus by O. validus and the actinian urticinopsis antarcticus annually kills approximately 3.5% of the A. conspicuus population. This mortality exceeds the apparent rate at which A. conspicuus escape the larval filter.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/1942321

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 704

Metadata

Authors
Dayton, P. K., Robilliard, G. A., Paine, R. T., & Dayton, L. B.
Venue
Ecological Monographs
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1974-01
Volume
44
Issue
1
Pages
105-128
ISSN
  • 0012-9615 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-7015
OpenAlex
W2091777825
Cited by
704
References
0
FWCI
14.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Biological Accommodation in the Benthic Community at McMurdo Sound, Antarctica. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1942321
The paper
Dayton, P. K., Robilliard, G. A., Paine, R. T., & Dayton, L. B. (1974). Biological Accommodation in the Benthic Community at McMurdo Sound, Antarctica. Ecological Monographs. https://doi.org/10.2307/1942321

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.