The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Forest Overstory Vegetation and Environment on the Missouri River Floodplain in North Dakota
Abstract
The study area, bounded north and south by two large reservoirs, includes the most extensive remnant of floodplain forest in the Dakotas. Structure and composition of the forest overstory are strongly related to stand age and horizontal and vertical position on the floodplain. Populus deltoides Marsh. and Salix amygdaloides Anders. predominate in young stands which generally occur on low terraces near the center of the floodplain. Fraxinus pennsylvanica var. lanceolata (Borkh.) Sarg., Acer negundo L., Ulmus americana L., and Quercus macrocarpa Michx., which replace Populus and Salix through time, predominate in old stands on high terraces near the edge of the floodplain. Stands intermediate in composition are uncommon because of the discontinuous meandering pattern of the river across its floodplain. Surface soil environment and species diversity change markedly during the course of succession. The soils of young stands are generally sandy and low in organic matter. Soil nutrient content and available water capacity are generally higher in older stands because of higher organic matter content and repeated inputs of nutrient—rich silt from past floods. Tree species diversity (H') initially increases as stands age, reaches a maximum in stands with mixtures of both pioneer and terminal species, and declines slightly in the oldest stands. Both variety and evenness follow a similar pattern. Analyses of population structure indicate a recent decline in the establishment of small stems of Acer and Ulmus. Tree core analyses show a similar decline in diameter growth rate for Acer, Ulmus, and Fraxinus. Available data suggest that these changes can be attributed to the removal of periodic spring flooding caused by the presence and operation of the reservoirs. It is also hypothesized that the lack of seedling—sapling stands of Populus in the region is the result of a presumed reduction in the meandering rate of the river following reservoir construction and poor seedbed conditions in the absence of flooding.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Poff, N. L., Allan, J. D., Bain, M. B., Karr, J. R., Prestegaard, K. L., Richter, B. D., Sparks, R. E., & Stromberg, J. C. (1997) · BioScience · doi:10.2307/1313099 · Cited by 6,500
Pattern, process, and natural disturbance in vegetation
White, P. S. (1979) · The Botanical Review · doi:10.1007/bf02860857 · Cited by 1,120
Woodland Expansions in the Platte River, Nebraska: Patterns and Causes
Johnson, W. C. (1994) · Ecological Monographs · doi:10.2307/2937055 · Cited by 549
Self-citationNanson, G. C., & Beach, H. F. (1977) · Journal of Biogeography · doi:10.2307/3038059 · Cited by 284
Death, R. G., Fuller, I. C., & Macklin, M. G. (2015) · Freshwater Biology · doi:10.1111/fwb.12639 · Cited by 153
Metadata
- Authors
- Johnson, W. C., Burgess, R. L., & Keammerer, W. R.
- Venue
- Ecological Monographs
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1976-01
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 59-84
- ISSN
- 0012-9615 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-7015
- OpenAlex
- W2009526302
- Cited by
- 411
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Forest Overstory Vegetation and Environment on the Missouri River Floodplain in North Dakota. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1942394
- The paper
- Johnson, W. C., Burgess, R. L., & Keammerer, W. R. (1976). Forest Overstory Vegetation and Environment on the Missouri River Floodplain in North Dakota. Ecological Monographs. https://doi.org/10.2307/1942394
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.