The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Organization of Contiguous Communities of Amphibians and Reptiles in Thailand
Abstract
In adjacent areas of broadleaf evergreen forest, deciduous dipterocarp forest, and agricultural land in northeastern Thailand, >4,000 individuals of 105 species of reptiles and amphibians were systematically collected. The position of capture of each individual was recorded in terms of a complex microhabitat code. The 3 environments differ substantially in pattern of human disturbance, in vegetation structure, and in range and predictability of temperature and total evaporation, the evergreen forest having the most buffered climate near the ground. Of the 3 environments studied, the evergreen forest has the most diverse and distinct herpetofauna, and the largest percentage of autochthonous species. The evergreen forest community has more southern or tropical affinities, while the deciduous forest community has more northern affinities. Analysis of the use of microhabitat categories by coexisting species reveals significant differences, even among the most similar sets of species. Differences in species richness among the three communities are not explained by differences in microhabitat diversity, mean niche breadth, or mean niche overlap. However, an ith nearest neighbor analysis of the dispersion of niche centers in resource space reveals closer packing and larger and more distinct guilds in the evergreen forest: the environment richest in species and the most predictable in climate. Both a graphical treatment and an analysis of sets of species grouped a priori according to their general natural history confirm the existence of larger and significantly tighter guilds in the evergreen forest. It is suggested that unpredictable environments tend to prevent the formation of distinct guilds, while the greater species richness of more predictable environments may be a function of guild formation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
NULL MODEL ANALYSIS OF SPECIES CO-OCCURRENCE PATTERNS
Gotelli, N. J. (2000) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/0012-9658(2000)081[2606:nmaosc]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 1,640
Conserving Southeast Asian forest biodiversity in human-modified landscapes
Sodhi, N. S., Koh, L. P., Clements, R., Wanger, T. C., Hill, J. K., Hamer, K. C., Clough, Y., Tscharntke, T., Posa, M. R. C., & Lee, T. M. (2010) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2009.12.029 · Cited by 386
Feeding ecology of thirteen syntopic species of anurans in a seasonal tropical environment
Toft, C. A. (1980) · Oecologia · doi:10.1007/bf00346717 · Cited by 375
The guild structure of a community of predatory vertebrates in central Chile
Jaksié, F. M., Greene, H. W., & Yáñez, J. L. (1981) · Oecologia · doi:10.1007/bf00376893 · Cited by 158
Seasonal Niche Relationships of Rain Forest Anoles
Lister, B. C. (1981) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/1941511 · Cited by 54
Metadata
- Authors
- Inger, R. F., & Colwell, R. K.
- Venue
- Ecological Monographs
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1977-06
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 229-253
- ISSN
- 0012-9615 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-7015
- OpenAlex
- W1982662910
- Cited by
- 221
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Organization of Contiguous Communities of Amphibians and Reptiles in Thailand. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1942516
- The paper
- Inger, R. F., & Colwell, R. K. (1977). Organization of Contiguous Communities of Amphibians and Reptiles in Thailand. Ecological Monographs. https://doi.org/10.2307/1942516
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.