Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 188

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Nutrient Dynamics of Aboveground Detritus in Lodgepole Pine (Pinus contorta ssp. latifolia) Ecosystems, Southeastern Wyoming

Fahey, Timothy J.·1983·Ecological Monographs

Abstract

Storage and fluxes on N, P, Ca, Mg, and K in aboveground detritus were measured in six contrasting lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta ssp. latifolia) stands in southeastern Wyoming. Litterfall was predominantly leaves (67—80%) in 80—100 yr old stands, while woody litter was more important in an older stand (240 yr old). Leaf litter nutrient concentrations were very low compared with other pine forests, particularly for N (0.40% dry mass). Dry mass loss from decomposing leaf litter was slow (15%/yr in first 2 yr), and summer rates did not differ significantly from winter rates beneath the insulating snowpack. Significant amounts of N, P, and Ca were added to decomposing leaves during the first winter, and N and Ca addition continued for 2 yr. Potassium and magnesium were rapidly lost from decomposing leaves. Rates of mass and nutrient loss from decomposing bark, twigs, and cones were comparable to those observed in other studies of temperate—zone forests. Mass loss from decaying bole wood appeared to be exponential through 40 yr, with an average decay coefficient (k) of 0.016, which is comparable to that in other cold temperate forests. Nitrogen content of decaying boles doubled between 30 and 55 yr following tree death, while smaller additions of P, Ca, K, and Mg also were noted. Relatively large accumulations of organic matter and nutrients were observed in the forest floor, leading to very high steady—state residence times for dry mass (mean = 18 yr), N (54 yr), P (39 yr), Ca (35 yr), Mg (21 yr), and K (18 yr). Deadfall contributed by the present forest generation was a minor component of the aboveground detritus except in an old—age stand and in a dense, self—thinning forest site. In contrast, dead wood inherited from the previous forest generation (killed by fire) was a major detrital storage component, exceeding forest floor mass by several—fold in 80—100 yr old stands. High nutrient immobilization in the dead wood led to storage values which were similar to those of the forest floor in these stands.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/1942587

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 188

Metadata

Authors
Fahey, T. J.
Venue
Ecological Monographs
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1983-03
Volume
53
Issue
1
Pages
51-72
ISSN
  • 0012-9615 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-7015
OpenAlex
W2138984356
Cited by
188
References
0
FWCI
14.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nutrient Dynamics of Aboveground Detritus in Lodgepole Pine (Pinus contorta ssp. latifolia) Ecosystems, Southeastern Wyoming. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1942587
The paper
Fahey, T. J. (1983). Nutrient Dynamics of Aboveground Detritus in Lodgepole Pine (Pinus contorta ssp. latifolia) Ecosystems, Southeastern Wyoming. Ecological Monographs. https://doi.org/10.2307/1942587

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.