The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Nutrient Dynamics of Aboveground Detritus in Lodgepole Pine (Pinus contorta ssp. latifolia) Ecosystems, Southeastern Wyoming
Abstract
Storage and fluxes on N, P, Ca, Mg, and K in aboveground detritus were measured in six contrasting lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta ssp. latifolia) stands in southeastern Wyoming. Litterfall was predominantly leaves (67—80%) in 80—100 yr old stands, while woody litter was more important in an older stand (240 yr old). Leaf litter nutrient concentrations were very low compared with other pine forests, particularly for N (0.40% dry mass). Dry mass loss from decomposing leaf litter was slow (15%/yr in first 2 yr), and summer rates did not differ significantly from winter rates beneath the insulating snowpack. Significant amounts of N, P, and Ca were added to decomposing leaves during the first winter, and N and Ca addition continued for 2 yr. Potassium and magnesium were rapidly lost from decomposing leaves. Rates of mass and nutrient loss from decomposing bark, twigs, and cones were comparable to those observed in other studies of temperate—zone forests. Mass loss from decaying bole wood appeared to be exponential through 40 yr, with an average decay coefficient (k) of 0.016, which is comparable to that in other cold temperate forests. Nitrogen content of decaying boles doubled between 30 and 55 yr following tree death, while smaller additions of P, Ca, K, and Mg also were noted. Relatively large accumulations of organic matter and nutrients were observed in the forest floor, leading to very high steady—state residence times for dry mass (mean = 18 yr), N (54 yr), P (39 yr), Ca (35 yr), Mg (21 yr), and K (18 yr). Deadfall contributed by the present forest generation was a minor component of the aboveground detritus except in an old—age stand and in a dense, self—thinning forest site. In contrast, dead wood inherited from the previous forest generation (killed by fire) was a major detrital storage component, exceeding forest floor mass by several—fold in 80—100 yr old stands. High nutrient immobilization in the dead wood led to storage values which were similar to those of the forest floor in these stands.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Compositions and fluxes of particulate organic material in the Amazon River1
Hedges, J. I., Clark, W. A., Quay, P. D., Richey, J. E., Devol, A. H., & Santos, M. (1986) · Limnology and Oceanography · doi:10.4319/lo.1986.31.4.0717 · Cited by 842
Metadata
- Authors
- Fahey, T. J.
- Venue
- Ecological Monographs
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1983-03
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 51-72
- ISSN
- 0012-9615 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-7015
- OpenAlex
- W2138984356
- Cited by
- 188
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nutrient Dynamics of Aboveground Detritus in Lodgepole Pine (Pinus contorta ssp. latifolia) Ecosystems, Southeastern Wyoming. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1942587
- The paper
- Fahey, T. J. (1983). Nutrient Dynamics of Aboveground Detritus in Lodgepole Pine (Pinus contorta ssp. latifolia) Ecosystems, Southeastern Wyoming. Ecological Monographs. https://doi.org/10.2307/1942587
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.