Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 160

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Annual Pattern and Spatial Distribution of Aquatic Oxygen Metabolism in Boreal Forest Watersheds

Naiman, Robert J.·1983·Ecological Monographs

Abstract

The level and diversity of metabolism in lotic ecosystems are largely functions of channel geomorphology and hydrology, making site—specific studies difficult to extrapolate to other parts of the watershed. This paper describes the pattern and distribution of aquatic oxygen metabolism for undisturbed boreal forest watersheds in eastern Quebec, Canada. Metabolism by periphyton, mosses, macrophytes, fine particulate organic matter (FPOM: 0.5 μm—1mm), an coarse particulate organic matter (CPOM: >1mm) was examined during the ice—free period (April to November) of 1979 and 1980 in First Choice Creek (first order; watershed area: 0.25 km 2), Beaver Creek (second order; 1.83 km 2), Muskrat River (fifth order; 207 km 2), matamek River (sixth order; 673 km 2), and the Moisie River (ninth order; 19 871 km 2). As watershed area increases, primary production and the number of autotrophic groups are augmented with moss and macrophyte communities. Total O 2 metabolism increases downstream, ranging from <1 g°m—2°d—1 in First Choice Creek nearly 5 g°m—2°d—1 during summer in the Moisie River. Autotrophic metabolism is not normally correlated with light or chlorophyll, but annual O 2 production is highly correlated with stream order (r 2 > .76 in most cases). These data are combined with a geomorphological analysis of the watershed to discern the spatial distribution of aquatic metabolism, and to estimate total aquatic metabolism in the Moisie River drainage network. Mosses, occurring only in streams of fourth or higher order, are the most productive autotrophic component in the watershed (3.9 x 10 10 g/yr); by comparison, periphyton produce only 2.1 x 10 10 g/yr. FPOM is the most active detrital component (6.6 x 10 10 g/yr). Geomorphic analyses show that streams of fourth or higher order comprise only 1.2% of the total number and 12.7% of the total length, but have 76.8% of the lotic surface area, and are responsible for 86.3% of the gross production by the entire lotic drainage network. The surface area of lakes is approximately six times that of streams, but their contribution (phytoplankton) to total aquatic ecosystem metabolism is comparable only to that of lotic periphyton. Results demonstrate that the River Continuum Concept can be extended to the watershed level by combining biological measurement with geomorphological analyses of the drainage network, thus allowing a detailed description of spatial and temporal patterns for specific metabolic components and total ecosystem metabolism to be constructed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/1942588

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 160

Metadata

Authors
Naiman, R. J.
Venue
Ecological Monographs
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1983-03
Volume
53
Issue
1
Pages
73-94
ISSN
  • 0012-9615 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-7015
OpenAlex
W2169021649
Cited by
160
References
1
FWCI
11.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Annual Pattern and Spatial Distribution of Aquatic Oxygen Metabolism in Boreal Forest Watersheds. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1942588
The paper
Naiman, R. J. (1983). The Annual Pattern and Spatial Distribution of Aquatic Oxygen Metabolism in Boreal Forest Watersheds. Ecological Monographs. https://doi.org/10.2307/1942588

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.