The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Comparative Analysis of Potential Nitrification and Nitrate Mobility in Forest Ecosystems
Abstract
The controls of potential nitrogen mineralization, nitrate production, and nitrate mobilization in a wide range of forest ecosystems were investigated through a combination of field and laboratory experiments. Trenched plot experiments were performed in 17 forests, and laboratory incubation studies of potential ammonium and nitrate production were made on soils from 14 of these sites. The site with the greatest potential for nitrate production in the laboratory was a New Hampshire northern hardwoods forest. Several other sites, including New Hampshire balsam fir, Indiana maple—beech, New Mexico aspen, and Oregon western hemlock forests, also had high potential nitrate production. All of these sites also had rapid nitrate movement to below the rooting zone following trenching in the field. Of nine processes which could be important in preventing or delaying solution losses of nitrate from disturbed forests, two appeared most important among the forests we examined. Low net nitrogen mineralization (caused by either nitrogen immobilization or low gross nitrogen mineralization) and lags in nitrification (probably caused by either low initial populations of nitrifying bacteria or the allelochemic inhibition of nitrification) were identified as important in several sites and in different regions. A direct relationship between the amount of nitrogen in annual litterfall and the proportion of forest floor nitrogen mineralized in laboratory incubations was observed, suggesting that refractory organic nitrogen compounds are produced in nitrogen—poor sites. An inverse relationship was found between the amount of nitrogen in litterfall in these and other sites and the carbon:nitrogen ratio of that litterfall, suggesting that the immobilization capacity of litter is increased in nitrogen—poor sites. The presence and length of lags in nitrification were inversely correlated with the mean concentration of mineral nitrogen in mineral soil. These patterns suggest that nitrogen retention within disturbed forest ecosystems can be caused by low nitrogen availability prior to disturbance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Testing a Conceptual Model of Soil Emissions of Nitrous and Nitric Oxides
DAVIDSON, E. A., KELLER, M., ERICKSON, H. E., VERCHOT, L. V., & VELDKAMP, E. (2000) · BioScience · doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2000)050[0667:tacmos]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 975
Vitousek, P. M., & Matson, P. A. (1985) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/1939189 · Cited by 438
Self-citationSchlesinger, W. H. (2013) · Oxford Bibliographies in Ecology · doi:10.1093/obo/9780199830060-0111 · Cited by 175
LeDuc, S. D., & Rothstein, D. E. (2007) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2007.05.029 · Cited by 57
Metadata
- Authors
- Vitousek, P. M., Gosz, J. R., Grier, C. C., Melillo, J. M., & Reiners, W. A.
- Venue
- Ecological Monographs
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1982-06
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 155-177
- ISSN
- 0012-9615 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-7015
- OpenAlex
- W1964004247
- Cited by
- 682
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 31.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Comparative Analysis of Potential Nitrification and Nitrate Mobility in Forest Ecosystems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1942609
- The paper
- Vitousek, P. M., Gosz, J. R., Grier, C. C., Melillo, J. M., & Reiners, W. A. (1982). A Comparative Analysis of Potential Nitrification and Nitrate Mobility in Forest Ecosystems. Ecological Monographs. https://doi.org/10.2307/1942609
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.