The DOI matches its Crossref record.
From Confusion to Clarity: Issues and American Voters, 1956–1968
Abstract
Analysis of national election surveys from 1956 to 1968 reveals significant changes in the voters' perceptions of issues and the major parties. There has been a considerable increase in the correlation of party identification and opinion on six major issues, relating to social welfare, racial integration, and foreign aid. Voters are more prone to see a difference between the parties on these issues and are increasingly likely to identify the Democratic party as favorable to federal governmental action. These findings contrast with those of The American Voter and similar studies. The reasons for the changes cannot be found in demographic factors, as tested by controls for age cohorts, education, region, and race. More probably the explanation lies in strictly political factors. A particularly important event was the presidential campaign of 1964, in which ideological differences between the parties were deliberately emphasized. The electorate responded to this campaign by becoming more ideologically aware, and its learning appears to have persisted through the 1968 election. This finding suggests that past conclusions about the low ideological awareness of the electorate were specific to the Eisenhower era, and that the issue content of the vote will vary with the stimuli provided by the general political environment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Measuring Political Sophistication
Luskin, R. C. (1987) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.2307/2111227 · Cited by 939
Foreign Affairs and Issue Voting: Do Presidential Candidates “Waltz Before a Blind Audience?”
Aldrich, J. H., Sullivan, J. L., & Borgida, E. (1989) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.2307/1956437 · Cited by 601
Bafumi, J., & Shapiro, R. Y. (2009) · The Journal of Politics · doi:10.1017/s0022381608090014 · Cited by 449
On the Structure and Sequence of Issue Evolution
Carmines, E. G., & Stimson, J. A. (1986) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.2307/1960544 · Cited by 320
Leech, B. L. (2010) · The Oxford Handbook of American Political Parties and Interest Groups · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199542628.003.0028 · Cited by 91
Metadata
- Authors
- Pomper, G. M.
- Venue
- American Political Science Review
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 1972-06
- Volume
- 66
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 415-428
- ISSN
- 0003-0554 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5943
- OpenAlex
- W2312913484
- Cited by
- 306
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 256.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: From Confusion to Clarity: Issues and American Voters, 1956–1968. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1957786
- The paper
- Pomper, G. M. (1972). From Confusion to Clarity: Issues and American Voters, 1956–1968. American Political Science Review. https://doi.org/10.2307/1957786
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.