The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Contraceptive Failure in the United States: A Critical Review of the Literature
Abstract
The overall goal of this paper is to provide for the first time a comprehensive critical review of the literature on contraceptive failure in developed countries, primarily the United States. The first two sections of our paper lay the groundwork for a critical assessment of the extensive body of studies on this subject, by systematically exploring the concepts and measurement of contraceptive efficacy and the methodological pitfalls that snare many investigators and compromise their results. The next two sections focus on results in the literature. First we provide a method-by-method critique of the available studies and then we summarize our conclusions in a single table that provides efficacy information necessary for women and couples to make an informed choice of a method of contraception. We close with a set of substantive observations and also a set of methodological recommendations intended to improve the quality and comparability of findings from future research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Condom effectiveness in reducing heterosexual HIV transmission.
Weller, S. C., & Davis-Beaty, K. (2002) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd003255 · Cited by 846
Manipulation of Human Ovarian Function: Physiological Concepts and Clinical Consequences*
Fauser, B. C. J. M., & van Heusden, A. M. (1997) · Endocrine Reviews · doi:10.1210/edrv.18.1.0290 · Cited by 509
Contraceptive efficacy of testosterone-induced azoospermia in normal men
(1990) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/0140-6736(90)92416-f · Cited by 428
Contraceptive failure in the United States
Trussell, J. (2004) · Contraception · doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2004.03.009 · Cited by 420
Self-citationSundaram, A., Vaughan, B., Kost, K., Bankole, A., Finer, L., Singh, S., & Trussell, J. (2017) · Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health · doi:10.1363/psrh.12017 · Cited by 287
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Trussell, J., & Kost, K.
- Venue
- Studies in Family Planning
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1987-09
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 237
- ISSN
- 0039-3665 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1968517014
- Cited by
- 286
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Contraceptive Failure in the United States: A Critical Review of the Literature. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1966856
- The paper
- Trussell, J., & Kost, K. (1987). Contraceptive Failure in the United States: A Critical Review of the Literature. Studies in Family Planning. https://doi.org/10.2307/1966856
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.