Non-Cooperative Games
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The state described by Wardrop's First Principle, or User Equilibrium, is a Nash Equilibrium from non-cooperative game theory because no individual driver can reduce travel cost by unilaterally changing route.
“The state described by Wardrop's First Principle is a direct application of the concept of a Nash Equilibrium from non-cooperative game theory [22, 23].”
From Classical Paradigm of Transportation Modeling (2026) · cites this paper as [22]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
Cited by 7,002
- Authors
- Nash, J.
- Corresponding author
- Nash, John
- Venue
- The Annals of Mathematics
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1951-09
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 286
- ISSN
- 0003-486X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4234761190
- Cited by
- 7,002
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 207 · 2025: 303 · 2024: 310 · 2023: 354 · 2022: 352 · 2021: 346 · 2020: 356 · 2019: 376 · 2018: 380 · 2017: 347 · 2016: 276 · 2015: 283 · 2014: 258 · 2013: 271 · 2012: 244
- FWCI
- 0.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Annals of Mathematics (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Game Theory and Applications
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Game Theory and Voting Systems
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation
- Keywords
- non-cooperative game, game theory, Nash equilibrium, strategic interaction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
