The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Cultural Dynamics and Economic Theories of Fertility Change
Abstract
The Maslowian theory of the articulation of higher order needs was correlated to the classic economic utility theory and additional ecological theories concerning cultural mobility were considered. The notions of individuation embourgeoisement and civil religion form the foundation of interpretation of changes in Western family formation. The operationalization of these concepts was described and a model of ideational change was proposed. The model of ideational change is cohort-and education-driven; a period-cohort interaction is recognized that may capture the dialectics of idealization and subsequent disenchantment with institutional regulation. The two most salient features of Western ideational change have been the precesses of secularization and individuation. A value scale used exerted a marked impact on the proportion of young women currently cohabiting (or sharing). In Belgium Denmark France and Germany with sharing a minor confounding factor large deviations from the grand mean persisted after control for age and the two variables capturing material circumstance. Agnostics postmaterialists world citizens and nonconformists in familial matters exhibited 7-14% more nonmarital cohabitation at ages 18-29 than the average (23% among women not living with parents). Conversely young women with regular church attendance materialists nationalists and conformists fell 7-17% short of the grand mean. When Ireland United Kingdom the Netherlands which have more sharing or Italy and Spain with unknown proportions of sharing were included the deviations from the overall mean were only slightly attenuated for the religiosity and nonconformism scales. It was documented that cultural changes are not unstructured or simply endogenous. The individuation process has continued to progress despite the degradation of economic opportunities for young adults in Western Europe. The Durkheimian dimension of social integration via the acceptance or refutation of institutional regulation had a direct relationship to changes in family formation family distribution and procreation during the postwar period.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
When Does Religion Influence Fertility?
McQuillan, K. (2004) · Population and Development Review · doi:10.1111/j.1728-4457.2004.00002.x · Cited by 434
Changing Relationships between Education and Fertility: A Study of Women and Men Born 1940 to 1964
Kravdal, Ø., & Rindfuss, R. R. (2008) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/000312240807300508 · Cited by 410
Attitudes, Values, and Entrance into Cohabitational Versus Marital Unions
Clarkberg, M. E., Stolzenberg, R. M., & Waite, L. J. (1995) · Social Forces · doi:10.1093/sf/74.2.609 · Cited by 375
Is low fertility a twenty-first-century demographic crisis?
Morgan, S. P. (2003) · Demography · doi:10.1353/dem.2003.0037 · Cited by 361
Cohabitation: A Precursor to Marriage or an Alternative to Being Single?
Rindfuss, R. R., & VandenHeuvel, A. (2019) · The Changing American Family · doi:10.4324/9780429309441-7 · Cited by 326
Metadata
- Authors
- Lesthaeghe, R., & Surkyn, J.
- Venue
- Population and Development Review
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1988-03
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1
- ISSN
- 0098-7921 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2079789359
- Cited by
- 712
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 20.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cultural Dynamics and Economic Theories of Fertility Change. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1972499
- The paper
- Lesthaeghe, R., & Surkyn, J. (1988). Cultural Dynamics and Economic Theories of Fertility Change. Population and Development Review. https://doi.org/10.2307/1972499
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.