Cited by 87Spacecraft Dynamics and ControlStellar, planetary, and galactic studiesHistory and Developments in Astronomy

Note on Stellar Perturbations of Nearly Parabolic Orbits

Öpik, E.·1932·Proceedings of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/20022899

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Oort Cloud is a collection of icy bodies that provides the source for long-period comets.

    “Distinct from the Kuiper belt, the Oort Cloud is a collection of icy bodies that provides the source for long-period comets ( ¨ Opik, 1932; Oort, 1950).”

    From The planet nine hypothesis (2019) · cites this paper as ¨ Opik, 1932

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Öpik, E.
Corresponding author
Öpik, E.
Venue
Proceedings of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1932
Volume
67
Issue
6
Pages
169
ISSN
0199-9818 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2801474631
Cited by
87
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Proceedings of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Spacecraft Dynamics and Control
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › History and Developments in Astronomy
Keywords
stellar perturbations, celestial mechanics, orbital perturbations, parabolic trajectory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review