The DOI matches its Crossref record.
China's New Diplomacy
Abstract
The recent crisis over North Korea's nuclear weapons has had at least one unexpected aspect: the crucial -- and highly effective -- intervention of Beijing. China's steady diplomacy is a sign of how much things have changed in the country, which has long avoided most international affairs. Recently, China has begun to embrace regional and global institutions it once shunned and take on the responsibilities that come with great-power status. Just what the results of Beijing's new sophistication will be remains to be seen; but Asia, and the world, will never be the same
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
China's engagement in Africa: scope, significance and consequences
Tull, D. M. (2006) · The Journal of Modern African Studies · doi:10.1017/s0022278x06001856 · Cited by 580
The race for critical minerals in an era of geopolitical realignments
Kalantzakos, S. (2020) · The International Spectator · doi:10.1080/03932729.2020.1786926 · Cited by 236
Godehardt, N. (2008) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1287161 · Cited by 10
Metadata
- Authors
- Medeiros, E. S., & Fravel, M. T.
- Venue
- Foreign Affairs
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 2003
- Volume
- 82
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 22
- ISSN
- 0015-7120 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1482548402
- Cited by
- 257
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 102.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: China's New Diplomacy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/20033754
- The paper
- Medeiros, E. S., & Fravel, M. T. (2003). China's New Diplomacy. Foreign Affairs. https://doi.org/10.2307/20033754
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
