The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Robot: Mere Machine to Transcendent Mind
Abstract
From the Publisher: In this mind-bending new book, Hans Moravec takes the reader on a roller-coaster ride packed with startling predictions. He tells us, for instance, that in the not-too-distant future, an army of robots will displace workers, causing massive, unprecedented unemployment. But then, says Moravec, a period of very comfortable existence will follow, as humans benefit from a fully automated economy. And eventually, as machines evolve far beyond humanity, robots will supplant us. But if Moravec predicts the end of the domination by human beings, his is not a bleak vision. Far from railing against a future in which machines rule the world, Moravec embraces it, taking the startling view that intelligent robots will actually be our evolutionary heirs.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Philosophy of Transhumanism
More, M. (2013) · The Transhumanist Reader · doi:10.1002/9781118555927.ch1 · Cited by 441
Evaluating large language models in theory of mind tasks
Kosinski, M. (2024) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2405460121 · Cited by 339
Ethical Issues in Advanced Artificial Intelligence
Bostrom, N. (2020) · Machine Ethics and Robot Ethics · doi:10.4324/9781003074991-7 · Cited by 187
Evaluating Large Language Models in Theory of Mind Tasks
Kosinski, M. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2302.02083 · Cited by 339
Dodig Crnkovic, G., & Çürüklü, B. (2012) · Ethics and Information Technology · doi:10.1007/s10676-011-9278-2 · Cited by 90
The First Minds: Caterpillars, Karyotes, and Consciousness
Reber, A. S. (2018) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190854157.001.0001 · Cited by 65
Metadata
- Authors
- Cohen, E. A., & Moravec, H. P.
- Venue
- Foreign Affairs
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1999
- Volume
- 78
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 131
- ISSN
- 0015-7120
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review