The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Student Self-Assessment in the Foreign Language Classroom: The Place of Authentic Assessment Instruments in the Spanish Language Classroom
Abstract
Recent research on the teaching and learning of Spanish shows an increased focus on student-centered learning environments and corresponding methods of evaluation. Such renovations encourage students to take responsibility for learner outcomes and to individualize goals and tasks. The implementation of student self-assessment is an important mechanism through which learners interact with instructors and develop the requisite introspective skills to evaluate their own progress. Self-assessment rubrics can be applied to student activities such as class participation, long-term projects and portfolios with varied content. In addition to an increased clarity of instructor expectations, such methods improve student outcomes by delineating clear paths toward progress. Instructors of Spanish can adapt student self-assessment methods to meet individual pedagogical needs for a variety of levels of instruction.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“several scholars have shown that self-assessment practices in the language classroom lead to student involvement in the learning process, learner autonomy, increased”
From Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis (2000) · cites this paper as Geeslin, 2003
In the citing paper
“several scholars have shown that self-assessment practices in the language classroom lead to student involvement in the learning process, learner autonomy, increased”
From Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis (2000) · cites this paper as Geeslin, 2003
In the citing paper
“several scholars have shown that self-assessment practices in the language classroom lead to student involvement in the learning process, learner autonomy, increased”
From Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis (2000) · cites this paper as Geeslin, 2003
In the citing paper
“several scholars have shown that self-assessment practices in the language classroom lead to student involvement in the learning process, learner autonomy, increased”
From Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis (2000) · cites this paper as Geeslin, 2003
In the citing paper
“During the last decade shifts in language teaching and learning have been addressing the need to implement learner-centred environments, moving from a teachercentred style to a learner-centred one (Geeslin, 2003;Tudor, 1996).”
From Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis (2000) · cites this paper as Geeslin, 2003
1 more claim about this paper
Create a free account to see every claim other papers make about this one.
Citations
Cited by
Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis
Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L. (2000) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/0023-8333.00136 · Cited by 2,569
Metadata
- Authors
- Geeslin, K. L.
- Corresponding author
- Geeslin, Kimberly L.
- ORCID
- Geeslin, Kimberly L.
- Venue
- Hispania
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 2003-12-01
- Volume
- 86
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 857
- ISSN
- 0018-2133 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2017246750
- Cited by
- 31
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 1.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Hispania (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
- Keywords
- student self-assessment, authentic assessment, Spanish language teaching, self-assessment rubric, student-centered learning, portfolio assessment, student participation, student responsibility
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review