Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 418

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

IS HIGH EMPLOYEE TURNOVER REALLY HARMFUL? AN EMPIRICAL TEST USING COMPANY RECORDS.

Glebbeek, A. C., Bax, E. H.·2004·Academy of Management Journal

Abstract

We tested the hypothesis that employee turnover and firm performance have an inverted U-shaped relationship: overly high or low turnover is harmful. Our analysis was based on economic performance data from 110 offices of a temporary employment agency. These offices had high variation in turnover but were otherwise similar, allowing control for important intervening variables. Regression analysis revealed a curvilinear relationship; high turnover was harmful, but the inverted U-shape was not observed with certainty.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/20159578

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 418

Metadata

Authors
Glebbeek, A. C., & Bax, E. H.
Venue
Academy of Management Journal
Published
2004-04-01
Volume
47
Issue
2
Pages
277-286
ISSN
  • 0001-4273 (ISSN-L)
  • 1948-0989
OpenAlex
W2158171202
Cited by
418
References
1
FWCI
21.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: IS HIGH EMPLOYEE TURNOVER REALLY HARMFUL? AN EMPIRICAL TEST USING COMPANY RECORDS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/20159578
The paper
Glebbeek, A. C., & Bax, E. H. (2004). IS HIGH EMPLOYEE TURNOVER REALLY HARMFUL? AN EMPIRICAL TEST USING COMPANY RECORDS. Academy of Management Journal. https://doi.org/10.2307/20159578

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.