The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Home from the War: Vietnam Veterans, Neither Victims nor Executioners
Abstract
The reissuing of Robert Jay Lifton's moving and important 1973 study of Vietnam veterans can serve as a timely reminder of how easily and how much we forget. Lifton's study, furthermore, raises the of what we as a society have learned from the pain, guilt, and rage of these men, and from our own unease over a small, undeclared war that we lost. Lifton's work is based on two years5 intensive participation in weekly groups55 with veterans that met in the New York office of the Vietnam Veterans Against the War. This program, which he initiated in 1970, was part of an effort by participants to make sense of their experience, and to deal with the numbing55 response that so many had adopted as a defense against acceptance of guilt. Lifton takes care to point out that the 400 men involved in his rap sessions and interviews were in no sense representative of all Vietnam veterans; most had seen active duty, and most came to articulate a clear antiwar position on their return. Similarly, Lifton himself is neither a dispassionate phantom researcher,55 nor the remote psychiatrist in the traditional doctor-patient relationship. (He indeed argues against both stances.) His purpose is instead that of raising the important question of the significance of an important change undergone by a relatively small group of men for a larger change in human consciousness55 (p. 21). Thus, the study must be read at three intertwined levels: for what it tells us about the troubled veterans who are still with us, for what it tells us about the war and its implications for the larger society, and (most impor tant) for what it tells us about psychological insight, transformation, and growth. Indeed, the difficulty in reading and absorbing what Lifton has to say stems from the complex interplay of these three themes. The study is dense, sometimes repetitious, and difficult to follow in a linear way. Recent statistics on Vietnam veterans present an alarming picture. We already knew, at war's end, about the 57,692 casualties and the 300,000 wounded. We now are confronted with an estimated 40 percent unem ployment rate among this group, as well as a figure of 41 percent who have either served or are serving time in jail. Estimates on suicides, on problems from Agent Orange, and on alcoholism are equally stark. Lifton5s extensive quotations and analysis help to show why this is so, and why such statistics only hint at the debilitating psychological burden
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Moral Exclusion and Injustice: An Introduction
Opotow, S. (1990) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1990.tb00268.x · Cited by 1,313
Violence without Moral Restraint: Reflections on the Dehumanization of Victims and Victimizers
Kelman, H. G. (1973) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1973.tb00102.x · Cited by 733
The sense of immortality: On death and the continuity of life.
Lifton, R. J. (1973) · The American Journal of Psychoanalysis · doi:10.1007/bf01872131 · Cited by 131
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Brodie, B., & Lifton, R. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Interdisciplinary History
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1975
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 772
- ISSN
- 0022-1953 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2000491272
- Cited by
- 266
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Home from the War: Vietnam Veterans, Neither Victims nor Executioners. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/202878
- The paper
- Brodie, B., & Lifton, R. J. (1975). Home from the War: Vietnam Veterans, Neither Victims nor Executioners. Journal of Interdisciplinary History. https://doi.org/10.2307/202878
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.