Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 6Historical Art and Architecture StudiesHistorical Art and Culture StudiesHistorical Studies on Spain

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Enemies of Flattery: Velazquez' Portraits of Philip IV

Brown, Jonathan·1986·Journal of Interdisciplinary History

Abstract

Jonathan Brown, Enemies of Flattery: Velazquez' Portraits of Philip IV, The Journal of Interdisciplinary History, Vol. 17, No. 1, The Evidence of Art: Images and Meaning in History (Summer, 1986), pp. 137-154

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/204128

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Brown, J.
Corresponding author
Brown, Jonathan
Venue
Journal of Interdisciplinary History
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1986
Volume
17
Issue
1
Pages
137
ISSN
0022-1953 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2331111783
Cited by
6
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1
Type
book review
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The Journal of Interdisciplinary History (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Visual Arts and Performing Arts › Historical Art and Architecture Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Museology › Historical Art and Culture Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Historical Studies on Spain
Keywords
Diego Velázquez, Philip IV of Spain, portraiture, flattery, Spanish court painting, royal portraiture, Spanish Baroque art, political representation in art

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.