CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 384Political Conflict and GovernanceInternational Relations and Foreign PolicyPolitical Theory and Democracy

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Linkage versus Leverage. Rethinking the International Dimension of Regime Change

Levitsky, Steven, Way, Lucan A.·2006·Comparative Politics
DOI 10.2307/20434008
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Studies of regime change since the cold war have drawn considerable attention to the of democratization.1 Scholars have pointed to diverse forms of external influence, including diffusion, promotion of western democracy, multilateral conditionality, and the spread of new communications technologies and transnational human rights networks.2 Nevertheless, the relationship between the post-cold-war international environment and regime outcomes remains poorly understood. Recent evidence suggests that many of the most widely studied forms of international influence, including conditionality, U.S. policy, and democracy assis tance programs, have not had a consistent democratizing impact. Moreover, interna tional effects vary considerably across regions. They are stronger in Central Europe and Latin America than in Africa, East Asia, and the former Soviet Union. A new framework for analyzing the international dimension of regime change can help explain these patterns. The post-cold-war international environment, in this framework, operates along two dimensions: western leverage, or the degree to which governments are vulnerable to external democratizing pressure, and linkage to the West, or the density of ties (economic, political, diplomatic, social, and organization al) and cross-border flows (of trade and investment, people, and communication) between particular countries and the United States, the European Union (EU), and western-led multilateral institutions.3 Leverage in the absence of linkage has rarely been sufficient to induce democratization since the end of the cold war. Although external pressure at times succeeded in forcing elections or blocking authoritarian regressions, the more diffuse effects of linkage have contributed more consistently to democratization. Linkage has raised the cost of autocratic abuses by increasing their international salience and the likelihood of external response, enhancing the power and prestige of opposition forces, and expanding the number of domestic actors with a political, economic, or professional stake in adhering to international norms Cross-national variation in international influence on democratization is rooted in differences in degree of linkage and leverage. Where linkage is extensive, as in much of Central Europe and Latin America, international pressure is intense and consis tent, at times contributing to democratization even in countries with unfavorable domestic conditions. Lower levels of linkage create a more permissive international

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/20434008

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 16 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 301–384 of 384

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Levitsky, S., & Way, L. A.
ORCID
Way, Lucan A.
Venue
Comparative Politics
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
2006-07-01
Volume
38
Issue
4
Pages
379
ISSN
0010-4159 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.2307/20434008
OpenAlex
W1976155711
Cited by
384
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 42 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 37 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 16
FWCI
31.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Comparative Politics (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political Conflict and Governance
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › International Relations and Foreign Policy
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Theory and Democracy
Keywords
regime change, democratization, international influence, linkage, leverage, conditionality, support for democracy, authoritarian regression, opposition movements, international norms, regional variation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review