The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Revolution in the Chinese Iron and Coal Industries During the Northern Sung, 960–1126 A.D.
Abstract
Two approaches have dominated the study of Chinese industrial history. Work of the kind Professor Joseph Needham has done in his Science and Civilization in China attempts to trace the history of Chinese scientific and technological achievement from the earliest times. Recently some interesting investigations have also been made of industrialization along modern Western lines since 1800. Needham has collected valuable data about all periods but neglects the relation of technology to general economic history. From the other work we get a more or less comprehensive view of nineteenth century economic development, but this tells us nothing about an earlier era of significant growth and change. The purpose of this article is to outline the importance of iron and coal during the remarkable economic and industrial expansion which took place in the 166 years from 960 to the Jurchen conquest of North China in 1126 A.D.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“According to Liu, peak iron output in 1078 was around 13,500 tons rather than the 150,000 tons claimed by Hartwell.”
From China, Europe, and the Great Divergence: A Study in Historical National Accounting, 980–1850 (2018) · cites this paper as Hartwell (1962)
In the citing paper
“Many subsequent researchers argue that Hartwell seriously overestimated iron production in the Northern Song dynasty, and the estimates used here are taken from the work of Liu (1993), obtained by aggregating the annual quantities of iron used for coining and government purchases.”
From China, Europe, and the Great Divergence: A Study in Historical National Accounting, 980–1850 (2018) · cites this paper as Hartwell (1962)
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 17
- Kracke, 1955, Sung Society: Change Within Tradition, FEQ, 14, 479
- 10.1086/254940 · DOI
- Collins, 1918, Mineral Enterprise in China, 7
- Ginsburg, 1958, The Pattern of Asia
- Kaisaburō, Hokusō jidai ni okeru dōtetsu no sanshutsu-gaku ni tsuite (Productions of Copper and Iron and their Administrations under the Northern Sung Dynasty), Tōyō Gakuhō, 22, 100
- Nef, 1958, Cultural Foundations of Industrial Civilization
- Carlson, 1957, The Kaiping Mines (1877–1912)
- 10.4159/harvard.9780674333734 · DOI
- Needham, 1954, Science and Civilization in China
- Nef, 1932, The Rise of the British Coal Industry
- Nef J. U. , Rise of the British Cod Industry, pp. 215–223, 165–170.
- Ashton, 1951, Iron and Steel in the Industrial Revolution, 1
- Nakashima, 1940, Shina ni okeru Senshiki Shudō no Enkaku, Tōyō Gakuhō, 27, 88
- 10.1179/tns.1939.010 · DOI
- Dudley, 1665, Mettalum Mortis
- 10.1017/S002205070008236X · DOI
- Nef, 1950, War and Human Progress, 80
Cited by
The Anthropocene: Are Humans Now Overwhelming the Great Forces of Nature
Steffen, W., Crutzen, P. J., & McNeill, J. R. (2007) · AMBIO: A Journal of the Human Environment · doi:10.1579/0044-7447(2007)36[614:taahno]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 3,487
The Anthropocene: conceptual and historical perspectives
Steffen, W., Grinevald, J., Crutzen, P., & McNeill, J. (2011) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1098/rsta.2010.0327 · Cited by 2,411
China, Europe, and the Great Divergence: A Study in Historical National Accounting, 980–1850
Broadberry, S., Guan, H., & Li, D. D. (2018) · The Journal of Economic History · doi:10.1017/s0022050718000529 · Cited by 193
Metadata
- Authors
- Hartwell, R.
- Venue
- The Journal of Asian Studies
- Publisher
- Duke University Press
- Published
- 1962-02
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 153-162
- ISSN
- 0021-9118
- 1752-0401
- Cited by
- 64
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Revolution in the Chinese Iron and Coal Industries During the Northern Sung, 960–1126 A.D. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2050519
- The paper
- Hartwell, R. (1962). A Revolution in the Chinese Iron and Coal Industries During the Northern Sung, 960–1126 A.D. The Journal of Asian Studies. https://doi.org/10.2307/2050519
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.