CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 3Korean Peninsula Historical and Political StudiesHistorical and Political StudiesChinese history and philosophy

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

“Kim Yuk (1580-1658) and the Taedongbŏp Reform.”

Choe, Ching Young·1963·The Journal of Asian Studies
DOI 10.2307/2050631
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This paper is a preliminary study of Kim Yuka, a seventeenth-century reformer and statesman, and his role in the introduction of the tribute tax reform in the two southern provinces of Ch'ungch'ŏng and Chŏlla. It is also intended as a case study of one aspect of the actual operation of seventeenth-century Yi government. Special attention is paid to the inter-relationship between the mode of operation of the Yi government and Kim Yuk's reform efforts.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/2050631

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. Wagner Edward W. , “The Recommendation Examination of 1519,” Chōsen gakuhō, No. 15 (1960), pp. 1–80
  2. Sang-baek, 1962, Han'guksa, Kŭnsejŏn'gi p'yŏn, 439
  3. Hōkokusho, pp. 706–707, 714
  4. Chōsen jimmei jisho, pp. 1000–1001
  5. Hongsik, 1962, Kuksa tae sajŏn, 553
  6. Tochi seido chisei seido chōsa hōkokusho [“A Report on the Investigation of the Land and Tax Systems”] (Keijō), pp. 703–704, 712–713
  7. Kōzō Tagawa , “Richō kōbutsu kō,” [“A Study on the Tribute Tax of the Yi Dynasty”], Chōsen gakuhō, No. 9 (03 1956), pp. 103–163.
  8. Seikyū gakusō, No. 20 (1940), pp. 1–49.
  9. Ho-jin, 1962, Han'guk kyŏngje-sa kaeron, 191
  10. Wagner Edward W. , The Literati Purges (Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Harvard University, 1959)
  11. Chōsen jimmei jisho [“Korean Biographical Dictionary”], compiled by Chōsen sōtokufu, (Keijo, 1937), pp. 1000–1001.
  12. Kōzō Tagawa , “Kōnō ukeoi no konin,” [“The Official Recognition of Contract for the Payment of Tribute Tax”], Chōsen gakuhō, No. 19 (1961), pp. 55–104.

Cited by

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Choe, C. Y.
Corresponding author
Choe, Ching Young
Venue
The Journal of Asian Studies
Publisher
Duke University Press
Published
1963-11
Volume
23
Issue
1
Pages
21-35
ISSN
  • 0021-9118 (ISSN-L)
  • 1752-0401
DOI
10.2307/2050631
OpenAlex
W2315938025
Cited by
3
References
3
Citations by year
2014: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.cambridge.org/core/terms (unspecified, 17309 d)
Locations
The Journal of Asian Studies (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Korean Peninsula Historical and Political Studies
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Historical and Political Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Chinese history and philosophy
Keywords
Joseon dynasty, cholla, state taxation, state administration, reformers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review