The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Engendering Archaeology: Women and Prehistory
Abstract
Preface. Part I: Considerations for an Archaeology of Gender: . 1. Tensions, Pluralities, and Engendering Archaeology: An Introduction to Women and Prehistory: Margaret W. Conkey and Joan M. Gero (University of California at Berkeley and University of South Carolina). 2. Gender Theory and the Archaeological Record: Why is There No Archaeology of Gender?: Alison Wylie (University of Western Ontario). Part II: Space and Gender Relations: . 3. Contexts of Action, Contexts for Power: Material Culture and Gender in the Magdalenian: Margaret W. Conkey (University of California at Berkeley). 4. Households with Faces: The Challenge of Gender in Prehistoric Architectural Remains: Ruth E. Tringham (University of California at Berkeley). 5. Gender, Space and Food in Prehistory: Christine A. Hastorf (University of Minnesota). Part III: Material Aspects of Gender Production:. 6. Genderlithics: Womena s Role in Stone Tool Production: Joan M. Gero (University of South Carolina). 7. Womena s Labor and Pottery Production in Prehistory: Rita P. Wright (University of New York). 8. Weaving and Cooking: Womena s Production in Aztec Mexico: Elizabeth Brumfiel (Albion College). Part IV: Gender and Food Systems:. 9. The Development of Horticulture in the Eastern Woodlands of North America: Womena s Role: Patty Jo Watson and Mary C. Kennedy (Washington University). 10. Shellfishing and the Shell Mound Archaic: Cheryl P. Claassen (Appalachian State University). 11. Pounding Acorn: Womena s Production as Social and Economic Focus: Thomas Jackson (Biosystems Analysis, Inc.). Part V: Images of Gender: . 12. Whose Art was Found at Lepenski Vir? Gender Relations and Power in Prehistory: Russell G. Handsman (American Indian Archaeological Institute). 13. Women in a Mena s World: Images of Sumerian Women: Susan Pollock (State University of New York at Binghamton). 14. What this All Means: Towards a Feminist Archaeology: Janet D. Spector (University of Minnesota). Epilogue: Henrietta L. Moore (London School of Economics and University of London).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Programme to Practice: Gender and Feminism in Archaeology
Conkey, M. W., & Gero, J. M. (1997) · Annual Review of Anthropology · doi:10.1146/annurev.anthro.26.1.411 · Cited by 234
Self-citationThe archaeology of complex hunter-gatherers
Arnold, J. E. (1996) · Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory · doi:10.1007/bf02228931 · Cited by 215
A Black feminist-inspired archaeology?
Franklin, M. (2001) · Journal of Social Archaeology · doi:10.1177/146960530100100108 · Cited by 163
A Historical Archaeology of Capitalism
LEONE, M. P. (1995) · American Anthropologist · doi:10.1525/aa.1995.97.2.02a00050 · Cited by 157
Intemann, K. (2009) · Social Epistemology · doi:10.1080/02691720903364134 · Cited by 145
Metadata
- Authors
- Dyson, S. L., Gero, J. M., & Conkey, M. W.
- Venue
- Journal of Interdisciplinary History
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1992
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 309
- ISSN
- 0022-1953 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2009525468
- Cited by
- 1,073
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 119.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Engendering Archaeology: Women and Prehistory. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/205279
- The paper
- Dyson, S. L., Gero, J. M., & Conkey, M. W. (1992). Engendering Archaeology: Women and Prehistory. Journal of Interdisciplinary History. https://doi.org/10.2307/205279
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.