The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Hsün Tzu on the Mind: His Attempted Synthesis of Confucianism and Taoism
Abstract
Using contemporary Western philosophic ideas, this essay examines Hsün Tzu's view of the mind as both a director of action and a spectator of action. In analyzing the mind as director, Hsün Tzu argues against Mencius's idea that the mind simply extends one's natural tendencies. Hsün Tzu's presentation of the mind as spectator— an idea developed chiefly in his discussion of obsession—accepts Chuang Tzu's stress on the importance of detachment, but argues that such detachment need not necessitate withdrawal from normal action. Hsün Tzu's two views of the mind can be reconciled by examining the mind's relationship to desires and to moral judgments. That examination also leads to the conclusion that Hsün Tzu thinks moral judgments have only a conventional and not a universal basis.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“He contrasts this with Mencius ' xin , which -though in charge -derives its moral direction from firstorder desires, and must marshal the support of other parts of the self, such as the qi (Yearley 1980).”
From Body and Mind in Early China: An Integrated Humanities–Science Approach (2013) · cites this paper as Yearley 1980
In the citing paper
“Lee Yearley has argued convincingly that the Xunzian xin , for instance, is a rather autocratic, disembodied ruler, with preferences completely distinct from the first-order desires of the body and the power of absolute fiat over it.”
From Body and Mind in Early China: An Integrated Humanities–Science Approach (2013) · cites this paper as Yearley 1980
In the citing paper
“Even some of the Chinese thinkers who in fact posit a rather sharp divide between the xin and the emotions still embrace a relatively ' holistic ' model of the perfected sage, who has reshaped his emotions and desires to accord with the normative order. 37”
From Body and Mind in Early China: An Integrated Humanities–Science Approach (2013) · cites this paper as Yearley 1980
Citations
Cites
Ryle, G. (2006) · Rowman & Littlefield Publishers eBooks · doi:10.5040/9798216413257.ch-2 · Cited by 6,804
The Concept of Man in Early China
Munro, D. (2001) · doi:10.3998/mpub.19878 · Cited by 252
An Examination of the Place of Reason in Ethics.
F., C., & Toulmin, S. E. (1951) · The Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.2307/2021180 · Cited by 221
An Examination of the Place of Reason in Ethics.
Rawls, J., & Toulmin, S. E. (1951) · The Philosophical Review · doi:10.2307/2181428 · Cited by 160
荀子, & Watson, B. (1996) · Columbia University Press eBooks · Cited by 52
Theories of Human Nature in Mencius and Shyuntzyy
Lau, D. C. (1953) · Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies · doi:10.1017/s0041977x00111486 · Cited by 30
ANCIENT CHINESE THEORIES OF LANGUAGE
Hansen, C. (1975) · Journal of Chinese Philosophy · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6253.1975.tb00374.x · Cited by 11
Urmson, J. O. (1967) · Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-349-15267-4_15 · Cited by 11
The Concept of Man in Early China
Bodde, D. (1969) · The Journal of Asian Studies · doi:10.2307/2942541 · Cited by 9
Aristotle: A Collection of Critical Essays
Moravcsik, J. M. E. (1968) · Cited by 7
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- See Tzu Watson/Hsü , pp. 23, 73, 74, 151.
- Tzu Wztson/Hsun , pp. 139-40; Harvard-Yenching Institute Sinological Index Series. Supplement no. 22: A Concordance to Hsün Tzu (cited hereafter as Harvard Index Text), 83/22/3, 4.
- Tzu Watson/Hsün , pp. 163–64; see also pp. 15–32 and 171; in Mencius, see IIA2, IIA6.
- See Tzu Watson/Hsün , pp. 139-40, 150–52, 157–63. The best translation of wei is Legge's“factitiousness, ” but it is both arcane and clumsy.
- Lau, 1970, Mencius
- Graham, 1967, The Background of the Mencian Theory of Human Nature, Tsing Hua Journal of Chinese Studies, 6, 1
- Harvard Index Text, 3, 46
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Body and Mind in Early China: An Integrated Humanities–Science Approach
Slingerland, E. (2013) · Journal of the American Academy of Religion · doi:10.1093/jaarel/lfs094 · Cited by 115
Yu in the Xunzi: Can Desire by Itself Motivate Action?
Sung, W. (2012) · Dao · doi:10.1007/s11712-012-9280-3 · Cited by 23
(Un)consciousness? Music in the Daoist context of nonbeing
Kuang, L. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198804352.003.0018 · Cited by 22
Aspects of Xunzi's Engagement with Early Daoism
Stalnaker, A. (2003) · Philosophy East and West · doi:10.1353/pew.2003.0009 · Cited by 21
Wong, D. B. (2016) · Dao companions to Chinese philosophy · doi:10.1007/978-94-017-7745-2_5 · Cited by 20
Metadata
- Authors
- Yearley, L. H.
- Corresponding author
- Yearley, Lee H.
- Venue
- The Journal of Asian Studies
- Publisher
- Duke University Press
- Published
- 1980-05
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 465-480
- ISSN
- 0021-9118 (ISSN-L)
- 1752-0401
- OpenAlex
- W2029079529
- Cited by
- 33
- References
- 10
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Journal of Asian Studies (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Chinese history and philosophy
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical Ethics and Theory
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Classical Philosophy and Thought
- Keywords
- Xunzi, mind, Confucianism, Daoism, Mencius, Zhuangzi, obsession, detachment, desire, moral judgment, conventionalism, universalism
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Hsün Tzu on the Mind: His Attempted Synthesis of Confucianism and Taoism. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2054674
- The paper
- Yearley, L. H. (1980). Hsün Tzu on the Mind: His Attempted Synthesis of Confucianism and Taoism. The Journal of Asian Studies. https://doi.org/10.2307/2054674