Cited by 33Chinese history and philosophyPhilosophical Ethics and TheoryClassical Philosophy and Thought

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Hsün Tzu on the Mind: His Attempted Synthesis of Confucianism and Taoism

Yearley, Lee H.·1980·The Journal of Asian Studies

Abstract

Using contemporary Western philosophic ideas, this essay examines Hsün Tzu's view of the mind as both a director of action and a spectator of action. In analyzing the mind as director, Hsün Tzu argues against Mencius's idea that the mind simply extends one's natural tendencies. Hsün Tzu's presentation of the mind as spectator— an idea developed chiefly in his discussion of obsession—accepts Chuang Tzu's stress on the importance of detachment, but argues that such detachment need not necessitate withdrawal from normal action. Hsün Tzu's two views of the mind can be reconciled by examining the mind's relationship to desires and to moral judgments. That examination also leads to the conclusion that Hsün Tzu thinks moral judgments have only a conventional and not a universal basis.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/2054674

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 10 references

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. See Tzu Watson/Hsü , pp. 23, 73, 74, 151.
  2. Tzu Wztson/Hsun , pp. 139-40; Harvard-Yenching Institute Sinological Index Series. Supplement no. 22: A Concordance to Hsün Tzu (cited hereafter as Harvard Index Text), 83/22/3, 4.
  3. Tzu Watson/Hsün , pp. 163–64; see also pp. 15–32 and 171; in Mencius, see IIA2, IIA6.
  4. See Tzu Watson/Hsün , pp. 139-40, 150–52, 157–63. The best translation of wei is Legge's“factitiousness, ” but it is both arcane and clumsy.
  5. Lau, 1970, Mencius
  6. Graham, 1967, The Background of the Mencian Theory of Human Nature, Tsing Hua Journal of Chinese Studies, 6, 1
  7. Harvard Index Text, 3, 46

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 33

Metadata

Authors
Yearley, L. H.
Corresponding author
Yearley, Lee H.
Venue
The Journal of Asian Studies
Published
1980-05
Volume
39
Issue
3
Pages
465-480
ISSN
  • 0021-9118 (ISSN-L)
  • 1752-0401
OpenAlex
W2029079529
Cited by
33
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The Journal of Asian Studies (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Chinese history and philosophy
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical Ethics and Theory
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Classical Philosophy and Thought
Keywords
Xunzi, mind, Confucianism, Daoism, Mencius, Zhuangzi, obsession, detachment, desire, moral judgment, conventionalism, universalism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Hsün Tzu on the Mind: His Attempted Synthesis of Confucianism and Taoism. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2054674
The paper
Yearley, L. H. (1980). Hsün Tzu on the Mind: His Attempted Synthesis of Confucianism and Taoism. The Journal of Asian Studies. https://doi.org/10.2307/2054674