Cited by 35Chinese history and philosophyFamily Dynamics and RelationshipsPhilosophy, Sociology, Political Theory

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Conceptions of the Family in the Sung Dynasty

Ebrey, Patricia·1984·The Journal of Asian Studies

Abstract

The values and premises underlying the Chinese family system can be seen as an amalgam of several partially contradictory strains of thought, each with its own history and vocabulary. While ideas tied to the classical tsung model remained at the level of high ideals, seldom even emulated, notions related to the family (chid) and the continuity of the patriline were highly pervasive and would seem to account for much of the uniformity in Chinese family practices. In this article the ways these strains of thought reinforced or countered each other is examined through an analysis of texts written in the Sung (960–1279) period, a time of social and intellectual ferment when it was common to write on family matters with considerable candor.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/2055312

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In their generational scale, membership size, and internal organization, the kinship groups recorded on these Yuan genealogical steles show a strong 'jia [or family] orientation.'

    “In their generational scale, membership size, and internal organization the kinship groups recorded on these Yuan genealogical steles show, in Patricia Ebrey ' s useful words, a strong ' jia 家 [or family] orientation. '”

    From GENEALOGICAL STELES IN NORTH CHINA DURING THE JIN AND YUAN DYNASTIES (2016) · cites this paper as Ebrey 1984, pp. 224-32

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 37 · Cited by 35

Research works printed but not linked: 35

  1. Ebrey, 1984, Family and Property in Sung China: Yüan Ts'ai's Precepts for Social Life
  2. Wolf, 1981, The Anthropology of Taiwanese Society
  3. Sung, 1981, The Anthropology of Taiwanese Society
  4. Shūzō, 1978, Chinese Family Law and Social Change in Historical and Comparative Perspective
  5. Shūzō, 1967, Chūgoku kazokuhō no genri
  6. Noboru, 1964, Chōgoku hōseishi kenkyū: Hō to kanshū, hō to dotoku
  7. Han-sheng, 1979, Sung-Ming li-hsüeh yü tsung-fa ssu-hsiang, Li-shih yen-chiu, 11, 62
  8. Noboru, 1937, Tōsō hōritsu bunshō no kenkyū
  9. Johnson, 1977, The Medieval Chinese Oligarchy
  10. Kenji, 1979, Sōgen jidai ni okeru shufu, Tōyōshi kenkyū, 37, 509
  11. Liu, 1959, The Traditional Chinese Clan Rules
  12. Ebrey, 1981, Women in the Kinship System of the Southern Song Upper Class, Historical Reflections, 8, 113
  13. Ch'ü, 1959, Law and Society in Traditional China
  14. Burns Ian Robert . 1973. “Private Law in Traditional China (Sung Dynasty).” Ph.D. dissertation, Oxford University.
  15. 10.4159/harvard.9780674431041 · DOI
  16. Morimitsu, 1949, Chūgoku zokusan seido kō
  17. 10.2307/2718793 · DOI
  18. Chan, 1967, Reflections on Things at Hand: The Neo-Confucian Anthology Compiled by Chu Hsi and Lü Tsu-ch'ien
  19. Cohen, 1979, House United, House Divided: The Chinese Family in Taiwan
  20. Fei, 1939, Peasant Life in China: A Field Study of Country Life in the Yangtze Valley
  21. Yoshiro, 1980, Oyō Shu ni okeru zokufu hensan no igi, Nagoya daigaku Tōyōshi kenkyū hokoku, 6, 189
  22. Freedman, 1958, Lineage Organization in Southeastern China
  23. Waltner Ann Beth . 1981. “The Adoption of Children in Ming and Early Ch'ing China,” Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
  24. Furth, The Patriarch's Legacy: Household Instructions and the Transmission of Orthodox Values.
  25. Wolf, 1980, Marriage and Adoption in China, 1845–1945
  26. Twitchett, 1959, Confucianism in Action
  27. Xu, 1980, The Feudal Clan System Inherited from the Song and Ming Periods, Chinese Social Science, 3, 29
  28. Hymes Robert Paul . 1979. “Prominence and Power in Sung China: The Local Elite of Fu-chou, Chiang-hsi.” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.
  29. Liu, 1959, Confucianism in Action
  30. Yasuhiko, 1973, Tōsō henkakki ni okeru Kōnan Tōsairo no tochi shoyū to tochi seisaku—gimon no seicho o tegakari ni shite, Tōyōshi kenkyū, 4, 503
  31. Langlois, 1981, State and Law in East Asia: Festschrift Karl Bunger
  32. Makino, 1949, Kinsei Chōgoku sōzoku kenkyō
  33. Yang, 1945, A Chinese Village: Taitou, Shantung Province
  34. 10.1007/978-1-349-86123-1 · DOI
  35. Duby, 1981, Medieval Marriage

Metadata

Authors
Ebrey, P.
Corresponding author
Ebrey, Patricia
Venue
The Journal of Asian Studies
Published
1984-02
Volume
43
Issue
2
Pages
219-245
ISSN
  • 0021-9118 (ISSN-L)
  • 1752-0401
OpenAlex
W2130021380
Cited by
35
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 12 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The Journal of Asian Studies (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Chinese history and philosophy
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Philosophy, Sociology, Political Theory
Keywords
Song dynasty, family ideology, kinship, Confucian family ethics, social history of the family

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review