The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Migration between India and Pakistan, 1951–61
Abstract
A critical evaluation of the available data on migration between India and Pakistan in the 1951-61 decade leads to the conclusion that there was a substantial net migration of Pakistan-born persons into India, but only a negligible net migration of India-born persons into Pakistan. Annual administrative statistics published by the Indian Government suggest an immigration from Pakistan of the order of 1.16 to 1.32 million. More importantly, birthplace data from the Indian censuses indicate a net intercensal immigration of Pakistan-born persons amounting to 1.19 to 1.34 million, depending on the assumed level of mortality. The Pakistani census data on the India-born show no net influx from India during 1951-61. Intercensal growth rates for the populations of different religious faiths in Pakistan are consistent with the estimates of net immigration into India. The migrants and the survivors of their progeny are estimated to represent a net gain of about 1.68 million by India and to account for no more than 2.2 per cent of the total population growth in India during 1951-61.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“On the other hand the multiple counting of persons crossing the border into India more than once caused an over reporting of refugees (Visaria, 1969).”
From Displacement and development: Long term impacts of population transfer in India (2019) · cites this paper as Visaria, 1969
In the citing paper
“Secondly, substantial changes in the administrative machinery and the relatively unsettled conditions in those districts that received refugees casts doubt over the quality and coverage of the data (Visaria, 1969).”
From Displacement and development: Long term impacts of population transfer in India (2019) · cites this paper as Visaria, 1969
In the citing paper
“The 1951 census provides the best estimate to date of the spatial distribution of the partition related refugees who moved from Pakistan to India.”
From Displacement and development: Long term impacts of population transfer in India (2019) · cites this paper as Visaria, 1969
In the citing paper
“A total of 7.3 million displaced persons were enumerated, of whom 4.7 and 2.55 million had come from West and East Pakistan, respectively, and 0.05 million did not specify their place of origin (Visaria, 1969).”
From Displacement and development: Long term impacts of population transfer in India (2019) · cites this paper as Visaria, 1969
In the citing paper
“Firstly, the data on region of origin does not provide enough granularity to identify the district of West or East Pakistan from which a refugee came from.”
From Displacement and development: Long term impacts of population transfer in India (2019) · cites this paper as Visaria, 1969
Citations
Cites
Regional Model Life Tables and Stable Populations.
Thompson, E. J., Coale, A. J., & Demeny, P. G. (1967) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C (Applied Statistics) · doi:10.2307/2985926 · Cited by 671
Regional Model Life Tables and Stable Populations
Widén, L., Coale, A. J., Demeny, P. G., & Widén, L. (1967) · Revue de l Institut International de Statistique / Review of the International Statistical Institute · doi:10.2307/1401642 · Cited by 476
Secretariat, I. P. L. S. (1955) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 35
Mortality and Fertility in India, 1951-1961
Visaria, P. M. (1969) · The Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3349133 · Cited by 13
Self-citationThe Population of Asia and the Far East, 1950-1980
Gibbons, W. J. (1960) · The American Catholic Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/3708613 · Cited by 3
On Some Aspects of Family Structures of the Refugees of West Bengal 1947-48
Pakrasi, K. (1965) · Sociological Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0038022919650102 · Cited by 1
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- 1961, Census. Vol. 1
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The demographic impact of Partition in the Punjab in 1947
Hill, K., Seltzer, W., Leaning, J., Malik, S. J., & Russell, S. S. (2008) · Population Studies · doi:10.1080/00324720801955206 · Cited by 38
Displacement and development: Long term impacts of population transfer in India
Bharadwaj, P., & Ali Mirza, R. (2019) · Explorations in Economic History · doi:10.1016/j.eeh.2019.05.001 · Cited by 29
Metadata
- Authors
- Visaria, P. M.
- Affiliations
- University of Mumbai (IN)
- Corresponding author
- Visaria, Pravin M.
- Venue
- Demography
- Publisher
- Duke University Press
- Published
- 1969-08-01
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 323-334
- ISSN
- 0070-3370 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-7790
- OpenAlex
- W2043599908
- Cited by
- 20
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Demography (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Australian National University
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Demography › Migration, Health, Geopolitics, Historical Geography
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Migration and Labor Dynamics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › South Asian Studies and Conflicts
- Keywords
- net migration, population growth
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
